Search Results for keywords:"Administrative Law Judge"

Found 3 results
Skip to main content

Search Results: keywords:"Administrative Law Judge"

  • Type:Notice
    Citation:86 FR 12028
    Reading Time:about 2 minutes

    The U.S. International Trade Commission decided not to review a previous decision made by an administrative law judge. This decision allowed US Synthetic Corporation to change the respondent in their complaint by replacing Zhuhai Juxin Technology with Guangdong Juxin New Materials Technology Co., Ltd. The issue was about importing and selling certain diamond products that might infringe on specific U.S. Patents. This change was made because nobody objected to the request.

    Simple Explanation

    The U.S. International Trade Commission decided not to change a decision that let a company switch the name of another company in their complaint about diamond products. This means they're updating who they're officially blaming without anyone disagreeing.

  • Type:Notice
    Citation:90 FR 11964
    Reading Time:about 2 minutes

    The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) has issued a notice regarding the inclusion of OLE (Object Linking and Embedding) objects in electronic tariff records. FERC warns that filings with embedded objects like program files, PDFs, and PowerPoint files may be rejected or require re-filing, as these objects aren't allowed. Additionally, FERC clarifies the use of ALJ (Administrative Law Judge) Settlement Codes, emphasizing that these codes should be used exclusively for settlements filed during hearing and settlement procedures. For any questions, contact information is provided for FERC staff members.

    Simple Explanation

    The Federal Energy people say not to put fancy stuff like pictures, fancy documents, or computer programs inside some digital forms they get because it makes it hard to read. If people want to ask questions or need help, they can talk to someone at the Federal Energy office.

  • Type:Notice
    Citation:86 FR 10335
    Reading Time:about 2 minutes

    The U.S. International Trade Commission has started a formal enforcement proceeding regarding a Consent Order linked to an investigation of blower components. This proceeding follows a complaint from Regal Beloit America, Inc., which alleged that East West Manufacturing, LLC and East West Industries violated the terms of the Consent Order. The order originally resulted in the termination of the previous investigation without the participation of the Office of Unfair Import Investigations. The aim now is to assess if a violation occurred and decide on suitable enforcement measures.

    Simple Explanation

    The U.S. International Trade Commission is checking if some companies, named East West Manufacturing and East West Industries, didn't follow the rules they agreed to about certain parts called blowers, after another company complained about it. They're seeing if any rules were broken so they can decide what to do next.