Search Results for keywords:"EPA"

Found 82 results
Skip to main content

Search Results: keywords:"EPA"

  • Type:Notice
    Citation:86 FR 7553
    Reading Time:about 4 minutes

    The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is extending an information collection request for the hazardous waste manifest system, allowing an additional 30 days for public comments. This request involves recordkeeping and reporting related to the tracking of hazardous waste, either through paper or electronic manifests, under the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act and the Hazardous Waste Electronic Manifest Establishment Act. The proposed extension also outlines the mandatory obligations for businesses involved, along with estimated burdens and costs related to compliance. Changes in the estimates indicate a decrease in the hours required but an increase in costs compared to previous assessments.

    Simple Explanation

    The EPA wants to keep track of hazardous waste using forms, and they are letting people say what they think about it for a bit longer. This is like asking everyone to help make sure the waste is dealt with safely, but how they figured out the costs and time it takes is a bit confusing.

  • Type:Proposed Rule
    Citation:89 FR 103737
    Reading Time:about 105 minutes

    The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has proposed a new rule regarding California's Regional Haze State Implementation Plan (SIP) for the second implementation period. The EPA plans to partially approve and partially disapprove the SIP submitted by California. While the plan addresses some standards, such as monitoring and emission inventories, it falls short in areas like setting proper long-term strategies and progress goals related to visibility improvement. This proposed rule opens a discussion about the elements of the SIP that meet federal requirements and those that need further improvement.

    Simple Explanation

    The EPA is looking at California's plan to make the air clearer and cleaner, and they think some parts are good but others need more work to make sure we can see far and clear in special places. They're asking people to talk about what works and what doesn't in the plan.

  • Type:Notice
    Citation:89 FR 100999
    Reading Time:about 3 minutes

    The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has submitted a request to renew its information collection requirements for sulfuric acid plants. This request, known as the New Source Performance Standards (NSPS) for sulfuric acid plants, is being reviewed by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) as part of the Paperwork Reduction Act compliance. Public comments have been previously solicited, and the current notice allows for additional comments until January 13, 2025. The regulations aim to ensure that sulfuric acid manufacturing plants follow environmental standards, with an estimated 53 respondents required to provide semiannual updates, amounting to a total estimated burden of 13,500 hours and an annual cost of $2,110,000.

    Simple Explanation

    The EPA wants to keep getting information from factories that make sulfuric acid to make sure they follow environmental rules, and they're asking people to say what they think about this until January 2025. They think it will take the factories a lot of time and money to send in their reports, and they want to make sure everything is working as planned.

  • Type:Notice
    Citation:90 FR 10907
    Reading Time:about 4 minutes

    The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has submitted a proposal to extend the information collection requirements for the National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) related to Taconite Iron Ore Processing. This proposal, which is currently approved until February 28, 2025, aims to ensure compliance with emission standards by collecting data from relevant facilities. Public comments on this extension can be submitted until March 31, 2025. The proposal involves mandatory initial and semiannual reports with an estimated total cost of $19,100,000 per year and affects seven facilities.

    Simple Explanation

    The EPA wants to keep checking on special rules for cleaning the air at places that make Taconite iron, which helps protect the environment. They're asking for feedback to see if they need to keep collecting information, and they'll continue to check in with the seven places doing this work to make sure they're following the rules.

  • Type:Notice
    Citation:90 FR 5875
    Reading Time:about 3 minutes

    The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has sent an information request to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) to extend the data collection required by the National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) for natural gas transmission and storage. This request, already approved until February 28, 2025, affects facilities that handle natural gas before it reaches consumers. The public has an extra 30 days to comment on the proposal. The estimated costs are $586,000 per year, with a total burden of 4,650 hours annually for 91 respondents.

    Simple Explanation

    The EPA is asking for permission to keep checking the air quality at places where natural gas is processed before it gets to people, which helps keep the air clean and safe. People have one more month to say what they think about this plan.

  • Type:Proposed Rule
    Citation:86 FR 1362
    Reading Time:about 2 hours

    The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is proposing a new rule regarding emissions from mercury cell chlor-alkali plants. This proposal aims to address standards for mercury and chlorine emissions to ensure they do not pose an unacceptable risk to public health or the environment. The EPA suggests that current practices at the one remaining operating facility sufficiently minimize emissions through monitoring and work procedures, but is also soliciting comments on technological advances and more stringent measures, like prohibiting mercury use altogether. Additionally, changes are proposed for record-keeping, electronic reporting, and ensuring emissions controls are effective during startup and shutdown periods. Public input is requested to ensure standards are protective and realistic.

    Simple Explanation

    The EPA wants to make sure a factory that uses mercury to make some stuff is safe for people and the earth, so they're checking up on it and thinking about new rules to make it safer, like keeping a closer eye on it and doing more reporting. They also want to know what everyone thinks about these ideas before they decide.

  • Type:Notice
    Citation:89 FR 104534
    Reading Time:about a minute or two

    The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is proposing a cost recovery settlement with U.S. Home, LLC, d/b/a Lennar, and B&J Excavating, Inc. regarding the A.I.W. Frank/Mid-County Mustang Superfund Site in Exton, Pennsylvania. The settlement requires the involved parties to pay the EPA $178,818.46 plus interest, covering the EPA's past response costs. The EPA is inviting the public to comment on this proposal until January 22, 2025. During this period, the agency may adjust or withdraw the settlement based on feedback received.

    Simple Explanation

    The Environmental Protection Agency (like a cleanup team for the Earth) made an agreement with two companies to pay them back for cleaning up pollution in Pennsylvania, but they need to hear from people if they think it's a good deal before they finalize it.

  • Type:Proposed Rule
    Citation:89 FR 107099
    Reading Time:about 19 minutes

    The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is asking for public comments on draft lists of companies responsible for fees related to evaluating the risks of five chemical substances under the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA). These substances are labeled as High-Priority due to potential health or environmental risks. Companies that make or import these chemicals must self-identify to ensure they're correctly listed for fee payments, but they can also claim exemptions or correct errors. The final list, setting out those liable for fees, will be released alongside the risk evaluation's scope documents.

    Simple Explanation

    The EPA wants to check if some chemicals are safe, and they need help from companies that make or bring in these chemicals. They are asking these companies to tell them who they are and to help pay for this checking.

  • Type:Notice
    Citation:86 FR 11290
    Reading Time:about 6 minutes

    The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) plans to submit a request to renew its WaterSense Program, which promotes water-efficient products and practices, to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for approval. Public comments are being sought on various aspects of the information collection before submission. WaterSense partners, including manufacturers and retailers, will be involved voluntarily, with the estimated total burden over three years expected to be 6,830 hours annually, at a cost of $598,527 per year. Recent program changes have reportedly reduced the estimated burden and operational costs.

    Simple Explanation

    The EPA wants to keep making sure that products (like faucets and toilets) use less water. They're asking people for thoughts on this plan, which will take some extra work, but they've worked hard to make it simpler and less costly to do.

  • Type:Notice
    Citation:90 FR 10920
    Reading Time:about a minute or two

    The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has announced a proposed agreement involving 231 parties related to the Pure Earth Recycling Superfund Site in New Jersey. Under this agreement, these parties will pay the government over $1.4 million for previous cleanup costs at the site. The EPA is inviting the public to submit comments on this proposal by March 31, 2025. The agency will review all feedback and may adjust or retract the settlement if necessary.

    Simple Explanation

    The EPA wants 231 groups to pay over $1.4 million for cleaning up a polluted site in New Jersey. They're asking people to say if they think this payment plan is fair by the end of March 2025.

123 Next