Search Results for agency_names:"Environmental Protection Agency"

Found 186 results
Skip to main content

Search Results: agency_names:"Environmental Protection Agency"

  • Type:Notice
    Citation:89 FR 104534
    Reading Time:about a minute or two

    The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is proposing a cost recovery settlement with U.S. Home, LLC, d/b/a Lennar, and B&J Excavating, Inc. regarding the A.I.W. Frank/Mid-County Mustang Superfund Site in Exton, Pennsylvania. The settlement requires the involved parties to pay the EPA $178,818.46 plus interest, covering the EPA's past response costs. The EPA is inviting the public to comment on this proposal until January 22, 2025. During this period, the agency may adjust or withdraw the settlement based on feedback received.

    Simple Explanation

    The Environmental Protection Agency (like a cleanup team for the Earth) made an agreement with two companies to pay them back for cleaning up pollution in Pennsylvania, but they need to hear from people if they think it's a good deal before they finalize it.

  • Type:Notice
    Citation:90 FR 10907
    Reading Time:about 4 minutes

    The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has submitted a proposal to extend the information collection requirements for the National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) related to Taconite Iron Ore Processing. This proposal, which is currently approved until February 28, 2025, aims to ensure compliance with emission standards by collecting data from relevant facilities. Public comments on this extension can be submitted until March 31, 2025. The proposal involves mandatory initial and semiannual reports with an estimated total cost of $19,100,000 per year and affects seven facilities.

    Simple Explanation

    The EPA wants to keep checking on special rules for cleaning the air at places that make Taconite iron, which helps protect the environment. They're asking for feedback to see if they need to keep collecting information, and they'll continue to check in with the seven places doing this work to make sure they're following the rules.

  • Type:Notice
    Citation:90 FR 10898
    Reading Time:about 4 minutes

    The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is seeking comments on the proposed extension of an information collection request (ICR) related to the National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) for benzene emissions from storage vessels and coke oven by-product recovery plants. This request has been submitted to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for their review. The ICR is currently valid until February 2025, and this notice opens an additional 30-day period for public comments. The EPA estimates that seven respondents will be affected, with a total annual burden of 1,130 hours and costs amounting to $143,000.

    Simple Explanation

    The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is asking people to share their thoughts about keeping track of how much benzene, a harmful chemical, is released from big storage tanks and special factories. They want to make sure the rules and checks continue so everyone stays safe, and they’re giving everyone another chance over 30 days to share opinions!

  • Type:Notice
    Citation:90 FR 10923
    Reading Time:about 3 minutes

    The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is seeking public comments on a proposal to extend the Information Collection Request (ICR) for Hydrochloric Acid Production under the National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP). This extension, involving facilities that produce significant emissions, aims to ensure compliance with established pollution control standards. Comments can be submitted until March 31, 2025, and the EPA estimates the total yearly burden to be 21,900 hours, costing about $2,980,000. This proposal does not anticipate significant changes in industry growth or costs.

    Simple Explanation

    The EPA wants to keep checking on how factories that make hydrochloric acid are doing with their pollution rules. People can tell the EPA what they think about this until the end of March 2025.

  • Type:Notice
    Citation:90 FR 5878
    Reading Time:about 3 minutes

    The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has put forward an information collection request (ICR) regarding the NESHAP for Beryllium Rocket Motor Fuel Firing, seeking the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) review and approval. This request is a proposed extension, already approved until February 28, 2025, and involves gathering data to ensure compliance with regulations stated in 40 CFR part 61, subpart D. The EPA had initially invited public comments on this ICR back in May 2023, and now offers a further 30-day window for additional public feedback. The request involves an estimated total annual burden of nine hours and costs of $1,450, with no expected changes in these estimates since the industry growth is negligible.

    Simple Explanation

    The Environmental Protection Agency wants to continue checking rocket fuel firings that use a material called beryllium to make sure they’re following the rules, and they're asking for thoughts from the public on this. It involves just one company and costs about $1,450 a year to gather the needed information to make sure everything is safe.

  • Type:Rule
    Citation:90 FR 573
    Reading Time:about 15 minutes

    The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has finalized a rule to update the list of chemicals required for toxic chemical release reporting under two acts: the Emergency Planning and Community Right-to-Know Act (EPCRA) and the Pollution Prevention Act (PPA). This update adds nine specific chemicals, known as per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS), based on a Congressional mandate from the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2020. These PFAS must be reported in the Toxics Release Inventory (TRI) starting with the 2025 reporting year. The rule is effective from February 5, 2025, and aims to improve public and governmental understanding of PFAS releases for better environmental management.

    Simple Explanation

    The EPA has made a new rule that says certain chemicals called PFAS, which can harm the environment, must be reported by companies from 2025 onward, so everyone can understand how much is being released and help take care of the planet better.

  • Type:Notice
    Citation:86 FR 7553
    Reading Time:about 4 minutes

    The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is extending an information collection request for the hazardous waste manifest system, allowing an additional 30 days for public comments. This request involves recordkeeping and reporting related to the tracking of hazardous waste, either through paper or electronic manifests, under the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act and the Hazardous Waste Electronic Manifest Establishment Act. The proposed extension also outlines the mandatory obligations for businesses involved, along with estimated burdens and costs related to compliance. Changes in the estimates indicate a decrease in the hours required but an increase in costs compared to previous assessments.

    Simple Explanation

    The EPA wants to keep track of hazardous waste using forms, and they are letting people say what they think about it for a bit longer. This is like asking everyone to help make sure the waste is dealt with safely, but how they figured out the costs and time it takes is a bit confusing.

  • Type:Notice
    Citation:89 FR 101000
    Reading Time:about 22 minutes

    The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is seeking public comments on a proposed permit, the 2026 Multi-Sector General Permit (MSGP), which regulates stormwater discharges from certain industrial activities. The new permit, once finalized, will replace the existing permit set to expire on February 28, 2026, and will be valid for five years. The permit will cover specific types of industrial facilities in areas where the EPA has authority, with comments due by February 11, 2025. Notable changes in the new permit include updates to stormwater control measures, monitoring requirements, and the introduction of certain effluent limitations to address environmental concerns like per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS).

    Simple Explanation

    The EPA wants people to say what they think about a new plan to control the dirty water that comes from factories when it rains. They want to make sure the water stays clean and safe, and they will listen to what everyone says until February 11, 2025, before making a final decision.

  • Type:Notice
    Citation:89 FR 101007
    Reading Time:about 3 minutes

    The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has submitted a request to renew the information collection for the New Source Performance Standards (NSPS) related to polymeric coating at supporting substrates facilities, extending its approval until December 31, 2024, under the Paperwork Reduction Act. This notice was published to allow an additional 30 days for public comments. The rules apply to 74 facilities, requiring responses initially, quarterly, and semiannually, with an estimated total burden of 16,400 hours and a cost of $3,330,000 annually. No changes in the regulations or burden are anticipated in the next three years.

    Simple Explanation

    The Environmental Protection Agency wants to renew rules for factories that make shiny coatings, and people have 30 more days to tell them what they think about it. These rules make sure 74 places check their work and tell the EPA every few months, and this takes many hours and costs a lot of money.

  • Type:Notice
    Citation:90 FR 16126
    Reading Time:about 4 minutes

    The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is seeking public comments on the renewal of an information collection request related to the Risk Management Program under the Clean Air Act. This program requires facilities that handle certain hazardous substances to create and submit risk management plans to prevent accidental releases. The agency is collecting feedback to evaluate the necessity, accuracy, and clarity of this data collection and aims to minimize the reporting burden. Comments are open for 60 days, and the EPA will review them before submitting the final request to the Office of Management and Budget for approval.

    Simple Explanation

    The EPA wants to know what people think about their rules for making places that use dangerous stuff create safety plans to avoid accidents. They're asking for suggestions on how to make this easier and clearer for everyone involved.

123 Next