Search Results for keywords:"withdrawal"

Found 17 results
Skip to main content

Search Results: keywords:"withdrawal"

  • Type:Proposed Rule
    Citation:86 FR 11477
    Reading Time:about 4 minutes

    The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) has withdrawn a proposed rule that aimed to replace an existing Airworthiness Directive (AD) for certain Agusta helicopters. The initial directive required inspections and set life limits for tail rotor blades, but the proposed changes were intended to expand these requirements to include new blade designs. The FAA decided to withdraw the proposal because it did not adequately address safety concerns and plans to address the issue in a separate rule. Despite public comments, the FAA concluded that additional steps are needed to ensure safety, leading to the withdrawal of the original notice.

    Simple Explanation

    The FAA was going to change a rule about checking and using parts of some helicopters, but they decided not to because the change didn't solve the problem. Instead, they will come up with a better plan to keep the helicopters safe.

  • Type:Proposed Rule
    Citation:89 FR 96152
    Reading Time:about a minute or two

    The United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) decided to withdraw a proposed rule that was aimed at adding a new requirement for terminal disclaimers to address nonstatutory double patenting. This proposal was initially published in the Federal Register on May 10, 2024, and received over 300 comments during the open comment period, which ended on July 9, 2024. After considering the feedback and due to resource constraints, the USPTO chose not to proceed with this rule at the moment. However, they acknowledged the input from stakeholders and emphasized their commitment to maintaining a balanced and reliable intellectual property system.

    Simple Explanation

    The USPTO decided not to go ahead with a new rule about how to handle cases where two patents seem too similar. They received a lot of comments from people and didn't have enough resources to move forward right now.

  • Type:Notice
    Citation:90 FR 9534
    Reading Time:less than a minute

    The Foreign-Trade Zones Board has announced the withdrawal of a proposed production activity notification by Rincon Power, LLC for its facility in Carpinteria, California, which is part of Foreign-Trade Zone 205. This notification was initially registered on January 30, 2025, and was formally withdrawn at the request of Rincon Power, LLC on February 5, 2025. The action was made official by Elizabeth Whiteman, the Executive Secretary, and was documented in the Federal Register.

    Simple Explanation

    The Foreign-Trade Zones Board decided not to go ahead with a plan by a company called Rincon Power to make some electrical parts in a special business area in California. Rincon Power asked them to stop the plan just a few days after it was first announced.

  • Type:Notice
    Citation:86 FR 8937
    Reading Time:about 2 minutes

    The Nasdaq Stock Market LLC proposed a rule that would allow them to deny or impose stricter listing criteria on companies based on their auditors or if their business activities occur in countries with restrictive laws, such as those that limit information access. This proposal was submitted to the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), which spent several months reviewing it and considering amendments. However, on February 1, 2021, before a final decision was reached, Nasdaq chose to withdraw the proposed rule change.

    Simple Explanation

    Nasdaq wanted to make new rules to be more careful about which companies it lists on its market, especially if the companies' accountants are not trustworthy or if the companies do business in countries where it’s hard to get information. But before these rules could be finalized, they decided not to make these changes.

  • Type:Notice
    Citation:89 FR 107135
    Reading Time:less than a minute

    Pacific Gas and Electric Company had asked the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission to change a requirement for ramping rates, which involves controlling the flow of water in hydroelectric power projects, for a project at the Battle Creek Hydroelectric Project. After initially seeking to alter this requirement, the company decided to withdraw their request on November 14, 2024. No one opposed this withdrawal, and the Commission accepted it, making the withdrawal effective on November 29, 2024, thus ending the proceedings.

    Simple Explanation

    Pacific Gas and Electric Company wanted to change how quickly they let water out at a power project, but then they changed their mind and asked to undo the request, which was officially okay with everyone.

  • Type:Rule
    Citation:90 FR 16085
    Reading Time:about 9 minutes

    On January 6, 2025, the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) had planned to implement updates to the HOME Investment Partnerships Program on February 5, 2025. However, following a presidential directive for regulatory review, HUD initially delayed this to April 20, 2025. HUD now announces further delays for certain parts of the program: one key provision is delayed until October 30, 2025, while another is withdrawn, with other sections remaining scheduled for the original April date. These changes are meant to allow more time for public input and to ensure compliance with existing laws.

    Simple Explanation

    HUD wanted to change some rules about helping people find homes, but they decided to wait a bit longer before making some of these changes, giving people more time to talk about it and join in. Some changes will happen soon, but others might take a while or not happen at all.

  • Type:Notice
    Citation:90 FR 10518
    Reading Time:about a minute or two

    The Options Clearing Corporation (OCC) submitted a proposed rule change to the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) to adjust fees related to contracts. They wanted to increase the per contract clearing fee from $0.02 to $0.025 and remove a $55 flat fee for large transactions. This proposal was originally filed on December 19, 2024, and opened for public comment, but on February 14, 2025, the OCC decided to withdraw the proposal. The withdrawal was officially communicated by Sherry R. Haywood, the Assistant Secretary of the SEC.

    Simple Explanation

    The Options Clearing Corporation (OCC) wanted to charge a bit more money for each thing they help people trade, and stop charging a special fee for big swaps, but then they changed their mind and decided not to do it.

  • Type:Rule
    Citation:89 FR 95136
    Reading Time:about a minute or two

    The Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) announced the withdrawal of a previous document published in the Federal Register at 89 FR 92830. However, the Scientific Integrity Policy of HHS, aimed at maintaining high-quality science and rigorous policymaking, continues to be effective. This internal policy applies to HHS employees and can be accessed through the HHS website. The policy does not alter any existing federal regulations cited in the document.

    Simple Explanation

    The government took back a document it shared earlier, but it wants everyone to know that its rules for making sure science is done properly are still being followed and can be found online.

  • Type:Rule
    Citation:90 FR 5740
    Reading Time:about 11 minutes

    The Federal Railroad Administration (FRA), part of the Department of Transportation, has withdrawn a proposed rule regarding the investigation of railroad accidents and incidents. The rule, initially published in October 2024, aimed to establish a standard process for information gathering and consultation with stakeholders during investigations. The decision to retract follows two negative comments criticizing insufficiencies and potential issues, including vague definitions and conflicts with existing practices. The withdrawal allows FRA to revisit the proposal and work with stakeholders to address concerns.

    Simple Explanation

    The government wanted to make new rules for looking into train accidents by talking to all the people involved, but they decided to take it back because some people said there were problems with the plan. Now, they'll try to make it better and talk more with everyone before trying again.

  • Type:Rule
    Citation:90 FR 9954
    Reading Time:about a minute or two

    The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is withdrawing a rule concerning Utah's hazardous waste management program because they received negative feedback on it. This rule was originally published on December 23, 2024, and its withdrawal means changes to Utah's program won't happen as planned. The EPA will address these comments in a future rule but won't allow for more public comments during that process. The rules involved were related to hazardous waste and environmental protection standards.

    Simple Explanation

    The EPA had a plan to change how Utah handles dangerous waste, but some people didn’t like the plan, so the EPA decided not to do it for now. They will think about what people said and try again later.

123 Next