Search Results for keywords:"international trade"

Found 48 results
Skip to main content

Search Results: keywords:"international trade"

  • Type:Rule
    Citation:89 FR 100303
    Reading Time:about a minute or two

    The Department of Commerce updated and finalized a rule on January 31, 2024, concerning procedures related to discrepancies between past trade agreements like NAFTA and the new United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA). This update corrects a regulatory error where language was mistakenly duplicated in the legal text, specifically in section 19 CFR 356.8(b)(2). The correction clarifies who can request the continuation of trade reviews but notes that foreign governments are not authorized to make such requests. The changes are effective as of December 12, 2024.

    Simple Explanation

    The Commerce Department fixed a mistake in some official rules about trade between the U.S., Mexico, and Canada. They removed extra, confusing words to make it clear that only certain people can ask questions about trade problems, but not foreign governments.

  • Type:Notice
    Citation:90 FR 11506
    Reading Time:about 4 minutes

    The U.S. Department of Commerce has determined that ending the countervailing duty order on circular welded austenitic stainless pressure pipe from China would likely lead to the continuation of unfair government subsidies. In their review, the Department did not receive a sufficient response from the Chinese government but received input from U.S. producers such as Bristol Metals, Felker Brothers, and Primus Pipe and Tube. Because of this lack of response from China, the Department conducted an expedited review. The decision and more detailed information are available in the Issues and Decision Memorandum, which is accessible online.

    Simple Explanation

    The U.S. Department of Commerce thinks that if the rules about stopping special money support for Chinese pipes are removed, China might keep giving unfair help to their pipe makers. Because China didn't say much about this, the U.S. did a quick check with help from some American pipe makers.

  • Type:Notice
    Citation:90 FR 9225
    Reading Time:about 5 minutes

    In a decision on January 24, 2025, the U.S. Court of International Trade ruled against the U.S. Department of Commerce's initial findings in an investigation concerning Brazilian raw honey. The Department of Commerce had originally accused Supermel, a Brazilian honey producer, of providing unverifiable data, and had imposed heavy duties as a result. However, the court found Supermel's discrepancies minor and ordered the review of these duties. Following this ruling, Commerce adjusted the duty rates for Supermel and other producers, relying on verified data rather than their previous adverse determination.

    Simple Explanation

    The court found that a honey company from Brazil wasn't cheating as much as first thought, so the U.S. is lowering the extra fees they wanted to charge for the honey it sells here.

  • Type:Rule
    Citation:89 FR 105470
    Reading Time:about 13 minutes

    The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has established a rule allowing a specific level of the pesticide ethiprole on imported sugarcane, upon request from Bayer CropScience LP, in accordance with the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FFDCA). The rule, effective from December 27, 2024, sets a maximum residue level of 0.07 parts per million. This comes after a review showing no expected harm to the general public, including infants and children, from exposure to this pesticide. The rule does not require any proposed rule issuance, nor does it impact states or tribal governments.

    Simple Explanation

    The EPA has decided it's okay to have a tiny bit of a chemical called ethiprole on sugarcane that comes from other countries because they checked and said it's safe for everyone, including little kids. Bayer CropScience asked for this decision, and it starts at the end of December 2024.

  • Type:Notice
    Citation:90 FR 8008
    Reading Time:about 5 minutes

    The U.S. Department of Commerce has decided to cancel the review of an antidumping duty order on specific chassis and their parts from China, covering the period from July 1, 2023, to June 30, 2024. This decision was made because there were no entries of the merchandise during the review period that needed evaluation. The antidumping duties will be assessed based on the rates required when the products entered the country. The notice serves as a reminder to parties involved to properly handle any proprietary information related to the review.

    Simple Explanation

    The U.S. Department of Commerce has decided not to continue checking if extra taxes on special parts from China are needed this year because no one actually brought those parts into the country during the review time.

  • Type:Notice
    Citation:86 FR 2479
    Reading Time:about 4 minutes

    The Office of the United States Trade Representative (USTR) has decided to indefinitely suspend additional duties on French products that were set to begin on January 6, 2021, in response to France's Digital Services Tax (DST). This decision comes as investigations into similar taxes in other countries continue, with the aim of allowing more time for discussion and potential resolution. The suspension reflects ongoing consideration of public comments and the advice of advisory committees. The USTR will keep monitoring developments in both the France DST investigation and other related investigations.

    Simple Explanation

    The U.S. decided to pause extra taxes on things from France because France had started a tax on digital services. This gives them more time to talk it over and hopefully work things out.

  • Type:Notice
    Citation:86 FR 6732
    Reading Time:about 4 minutes

    The U.S. Trade Representative has concluded that Vietnam's actions and policies related to currency valuation are problematic for U.S. commerce. They determined that Vietnam's management of its currency, particularly through excessive foreign exchange market interventions, gives it an unfair advantage in international trade. These practices were found to be unreasonable, burden or restrict U.S. trade, and therefore can be addressed under Section 301 of the Trade Act of 1974. The U.S. is considering further actions to address these issues.

    Simple Explanation

    The U.S. is upset because they think Vietnam is not playing fair with money rules that make them do better in trading stuff with other countries. They want to find a way to make it more fair, but they aren’t sure yet what exactly they’re going to do to fix it.

  • Type:Notice
    Citation:89 FR 97592
    Reading Time:about 7 minutes

    The U.S. Department of Commerce made a final decision determining that melamine from Qatar is not being sold in the United States for less than fair value. This final ruling follows an earlier negative preliminary determination regarding the same issue. As a result of this negative determination, there will be no suspension of liquidation or cash deposits required for imports of melamine from Qatar, and the case is considered closed. This decision was reached after looking into sales, costs, and verifying information from relevant Qatari companies.

    Simple Explanation

    The U.S. says melamine from Qatar is being sold in America at a fair price, so there's no need for special taxes or rules on it, and they've closed the case.

  • Type:Notice
    Citation:90 FR 10048
    Reading Time:about 21 minutes

    The U.S. Department of Commerce has begun administrative reviews of various antidumping and countervailing duty orders that have anniversary dates in January. These reviews will look into whether certain foreign goods sold in the U.S. are priced unfairly and harming U.S. businesses. The Department has outlined the procedures and deadlines for companies involved in these reviews, including how they can demonstrate they should be treated independently from government control in non-market economies. Additionally, the Department provides guidance on submitting necessary information and responding to questionnaires during the review process.

    Simple Explanation

    The U.S. Department of Commerce is checking whether some products from other countries are being sold too cheaply in the U.S., which could hurt American businesses. They are setting up meetings and deadlines to look into this, and companies need to follow special rules to explain their situation.

  • Type:Notice
    Citation:89 FR 100963
    Reading Time:about 14 minutes

    The U.S. Department of Commerce has released preliminary findings related to the sale of circular welded non-alloy steel pipe from South Korea. Between November 2022 and October 2023, some of this pipe was sold at prices below its normal value. The department identified one South Korean company that did not sell the pipe below its normal value during this period. They also calculated a small average dumping margin for Hyundai Steel and a higher margin for Husteel. Various other companies will have a margin based on Husteel's results. They are now seeking comments on these preliminary findings.

    Simple Explanation

    The government found that some steel pipes from South Korea were sold too cheaply in the U.S., but one company sold them at the right price. Now, they want people to tell them what they think about this finding.

123 Next