Search Results for keywords:"competitive effects"

Found 2 results
Skip to main content

Search Results: keywords:"competitive effects"

  • Type:Notice
    Citation:90 FR 12440
    Reading Time:about 23 minutes

    The Surface Transportation Board received a prefiling notification regarding a proposed transaction where Norfolk Southern Corporation and Norfolk Southern Railway Company aim to gain control of Norfolk & Portsmouth Belt Line Railroad Company. After reviewing the February 14, 2025 submission, the Board determined the transaction is "significant" rather than "minor," requiring more detailed information and compliance with different procedures. The Board instructed Norfolk Southern to amend their application, submit a revised procedural schedule by March 21, 2025, and to pay the additional filing fee associated with significant transactions. Additionally, the Board noted concerns from CSX Transportation and the Virginia Port Authority about potential anticompetitive effects.

    Simple Explanation

    Norfolk Southern wants to take over another railroad, but some grown-ups are worried it might not be fair to others. So, special rules and more information are needed to make sure it’s okay.

  • Type:Notice
    Citation:86 FR 7602
    Reading Time:about 40 minutes

    The Miami International Securities Exchange LLC submitted a proposal to amend its fee schedule, specifically to increase the network connectivity fees for its 10-gigabit ultra-low latency fiber connections from $9,300 to $10,000 per month for both member and non-member users. This increase is intended to cover the exchange's growing costs and ensure the fees are fair and reasonable, reflecting the resources consumed by users of the higher bandwidth connections. The exchange argues that the proposed fees comply with U.S. securities law, are equitably allocated, and do not impose an unfair burden on competition.

    Simple Explanation

    The Miami International Securities Exchange wants to increase its monthly charge for using fast internet connections because their costs have gone up, but they didn't clearly explain why the price hike is necessary or how it will help users. They also didn't ask people what they think about this change, so it may seem like they made the decision without enough input from others.