Search Results for citation:"90 FR 11966"

Found 2 results

Search Results: citation:"90 FR 11966"

💰 Only
Oldest Newest
  • 2025-03977 — Dicyclohexyl Phthalate (DCHP); Draft Risk Evaluation Under the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA); Notice of Availability and Request for Comment; Reopening of Comment Period
    Type:Notice
    Citation:90 FR 11966
    Reading Time:about a minute or two

    The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) announced they are reopening the public comment period for a draft risk evaluation on Dicyclohexyl phthalate (DCHP) under the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA). Initially introduced in the Federal Register on January 7, 2025, the comment period will now close on May 9, 2025, giving stakeholders more time to review and respond. Comments should be submitted online, and confidential information should not be included. For more information, contact details are provided for specific queries.

    Simple Explanation

    The EPA is giving people more time to say what they think about a chemical called DCHP. People can tell the EPA what they think until May 9, 2025.

  • 2025-04040 — Order Denying Petition To Set Aside Consent Agreement and Proposed Final Order
    💰
    Type:Notice
    Citation:90 FR 11966
    Reading Time:about 7 minutes

    The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) issued a notice denying a petition to overturn a Consent Agreement and Proposed Final Order involving the Frederick-Winchester Service Authority and Frederick County Sanitation Authority. This decision was made after reviewing a petition that claimed false statements were made regarding economic benefits and pollution control practices by the respondents. The EPA determined that these statements were not materially false and did not warrant setting aside the order or holding a hearing. The case details, including the order, are accessible online for public review.

    Simple Explanation

    The EPA decided not to change an agreement about fixing water pollution problems, even though some people said the first plans were based on mistakes. They looked into the complaints and found everything was okay, so the original plans will stay the same.