FR C1-2024-26935

Summary of the Document

The document in question involves a correction issued by the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) and the Department of Transportation regarding a regulatory update to a rule under BasicMed, a program related to medical certification for certain pilots. This correction specifically targets an amendment to Section 11.201, where an instruction was previously misinterpreted. The document clarifies that a new entry for "Part 68" should be added to a table, and it is to be placed in numerical order. This correction ensures accuracy in the implementation of the rule.

Significant Issues and Concerns

There are notable issues surrounding this correction. Firstly, the absence of a detailed abstract in the metadata overlooks providing readers with an immediate summary of the document, leaving them without essential introductory context. Additionally, the correction itself does not elaborate on why "Part 68" was added, which could create confusion among those affected or interested in the amendment. Furthermore, there exists a potential discrepancy between the rule document number and the correction document number, which might lead to challenges in ensuring the correct document is referenced. The phrasing of the correction, particularly "adding in numerical order an entry for 'Part 68'," lacks clarity without a visual of the actual table or additional context on existing entries, leaving room for ambiguity.

Impact on the Public

For the general public, this document may not directly affect daily life; however, it highlights the importance of precise and clear communication in regulatory documents. It serves as a reminder of the meticulous nature of legislative and administrative documents that often require amendments and corrections to prevent misinterpretation.

Impact on Specific Stakeholders

For stakeholders such as private pilots operating under BasicMed, medical professionals involved in pilot certification, and aviation regulatory agencies, this correction is significant. Accurate updates to regulatory documents are crucial for ensuring compliance and maintaining safety standards. Misinterpretations or omissions in such rules could lead to non-compliance or erroneous operational procedures, potentially impacting safety and enforcement actions negatively.

Overall, while this document touches upon a regulatory technicality, its implications underscore the vigilant attention needed in regulatory processes to ensure clarity, consistency, and the correct implementation of rules across involved parties.