Overview
Title
Proposed Collection; Comment Request
Agencies
ELI5 AI
The government noticed a mistake in the date they had announced for some important papers. They mixed up the dates and are now saying to change it from April 1 to March 8, so they fixed it by telling everyone about the right date.
Summary AI
The Federal Register published a correction notice for a previously released document from the Defense Department's Office of the Secretary. In the original document numbered 2020-29210, the date given in the "DATES" section was incorrectly stated. The date on page 531, column one, should be changed from "April 1, 2021" to "March 8, 2021".
Keywords AI
Sources
AnalysisAI
Commentary
The document under consideration is a correction notice published in the Federal Register by the Defense Department's Office of the Secretary. The purpose of the notice is to amend an error found in a previously published document. The original document, identified by its number 2020-29210, carried an incorrect date in its "DATES" section, which appeared on page 531 of the January 6, 2021, issue. The correction changes the date from "April 1, 2021" to "March 8, 2021".
General Summary
This notice is a formal correction that ensures the accuracy of official records. It highlights the importance of precise details within government publications, as even minor errors, such as incorrect dates, can have broader implications for the document's purpose and associated activities.
Significant Issues or Concerns
One of the main concerns with the document is its lack of context and explanation regarding the content and implications of the corrected dates. The notice does correct the date, but it does not provide information about the nature of the original document or the significance of the dates mentioned. Without this context, readers may find it difficult to understand the potential impact of the date change. Additionally, the notice assumes familiarity with Federal Register structures, which could be inaccessible for those not versed in government documentation procedures.
Furthermore, the document does not include an abstract or a brief overview of what the original document entails. As such, it leaves stakeholders and the general public without a clear understanding of the proposal or its potential effects. This lack of information could be problematic for those attempting to assess the document’s implications, particularly regarding government accountability or oversight.
Impact on the Public
For the general public, the significance of this correction might be difficult to discern due to the absence of detailed information about the original document. Without understanding what the document addresses, citizens may not grasp how the date change affects them or societal processes. This lack of transparency could reduce public engagement or interest in government documents published in the Federal Register.
Moreover, federal notices can often involve timelines critical to public participation, such as comment periods or implementation dates. Changing dates without substantive context can lead to confusion or missed opportunities for public input, thereby affecting civic involvement.
Impact on Stakeholders
Specific stakeholders potentially affected by the correction include those directly engaged in activities coordinated by the original document. These parties might face disruptions in planning or processes due to the alteration of timelines. For instance, if the original document related to procurement or project timelines, businesses and contractors that plan around such schedules might be impacted by the unannounced date change.
In contrast, stakeholders who benefit from an extended deadline could see the correction positively, as it might grant them additional time to comply with the document's requirements or to prepare necessary feedback.
In summary, while the correction notice serves an administrative function to maintain document accuracy, its lack of information and context may obscure the correction's practical implications for both the public and specific stakeholders.
Issues
• The document does not provide sufficient information on the nature or details of the proposed collection, making it difficult to evaluate potential wasteful spending or favoritism.
• The document lacks an abstract or explanation of the content, which may lead to unclear understanding of its purpose and implications.
• The language used is technical and assumes familiarity with Federal Register document structures, which may not be accessible to a general audience without specific context.
• The correction notice does not clarify the nature of the dates mentioned (such as the significance of 'April 1, 2021' and 'March 8, 2021'), potentially leading to confusion.