FR C1-2020-29208

Overview

Title

Proposed Collection; Comment Request

Agencies

ELI5 AI

The Defense Department made a tiny fix to a paper they shared before, changing a date from "April 1, 2021" to "March 8, 2021" so that everyone knows the right day to pay attention to.

Summary AI

The Office of the Secretary of the Defense Department issued a correction regarding a previously published notice in the Federal Register. The notice, originally published on January 6, 2021, had an incorrect date listed in its DATES section. The date “April 1, 2021” was corrected to “March 8, 2021” on page 529. This update ensures that anyone referencing the document has the accurate timeline information.

Type: Notice
Citation: 86 FR 7369
Document #: C1-2020-29208
Date:
Volume: 86
Pages: 7369-7369

AnalysisAI

The document under discussion is a correction notice issued by the Office of the Secretary of the Defense Department, published in the Federal Register. The correction pertains to a previously published notice on January 6, 2021, which had a date error in its DATES section. Specifically, the date "April 1, 2021" needed correction to "March 8, 2021".

General Summary

This correction notice rectifies a date in the original publication. The revised date is important because it could affect deadlines or timelines referenced in the document. The action is administrative, aimed to ensure accuracy in official records and provide clear information for those who rely on the document for planning or compliance purposes.

Significant Issues or Concerns

One notable concern is the absence of an abstract or any detailed information about the content of the original notice. This can make it difficult for someone unfamiliar with the initial document to understand the full implications of the correction. The correction notice is concise, but it lacks context about why the date change is necessary. For readers, this could lead to confusion about the relevance or impact of the correction.

Impact on the Public

For the general public, this correction may have minimal direct impact. However, it serves as a reminder of the importance of accuracy in official communications, especially those that involve regulatory or compliance-related timelines. Individuals or entities that needed to respond or take action based on the original notice must now adjust their plans according to the corrected date.

Impact on Specific Stakeholders

Specific stakeholders, such as government contractors, defense agencies, or any parties required to comply with the original notice, might be directly affected by this change. These stakeholders must be aware of the revised deadline to ensure they meet any submission or compliance requirements. The correction ensures that all parties are on the same page regarding when actions need to be completed, thereby avoiding potential penalties or delays.

In essence, while the correction itself is straightforward, the lack of additional information about the original notice could lead to challenges for those needing context. Stakeholders directly involved should verify all requisite actions to align with the new date promptly.

Issues

  • • The document does not provide sufficient detail to identify any spending or favoritism concerns, as it primarily deals with a correction notice regarding date changes.

  • • The absence of an abstract makes it unclear what the original notice was about, which could make evaluating its content more difficult.

  • • The correction notice is brief and its content is clear, but it lacks context about the nature of the document being corrected, which can be considered as potentially unclear or incomplete for those not familiar with the original notice.

Statistics

Size

Pages: 1
Words: 96
Sentences: 3
Entities: 11

Language

Nouns: 21
Verbs: 5
Adjectives: 2
Adverbs: 0
Numbers: 19

Complexity

Average Token Length:
3.78
Average Sentence Length:
32.00
Token Entropy:
3.88
Readability (ARI):
14.83

Reading Time

less than a minute