Overview
Title
Taking and Importing Marine Mammals; Taking Marine Mammals Incidental to Training Activities in the Gulf of Alaska Temporary Maritime Activities Area
Agencies
ELI5 AI
The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration made a small change in their paperwork, fixing a date from January 29, 2021, to February 8, 2021, for activities with sea animals in Alaska. They made sure this change was noted so everything is correct and clear.
Summary AI
The document is a correction notice from the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, which is part of the Commerce Department. It updates an error found in a previous notice regarding the taking and importing of marine mammals related to training activities in the Gulf of Alaska. The specific correction changes the date listed from "January 29, 2021," to "February 8, 2021." This correction is documented in the Federal Register as "86 FR 7714" and was filed on January 29, 2021.
Keywords AI
Sources
AnalysisAI
The document, as presented, is a correction notice issued by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), under the Commerce Department. It relates to the management of marine mammals in connection with training activities in the Gulf of Alaska. This correction notice is particularly focused on amending a date error from a prior notification.
General Summary
This particular notice is a corrective update to a previous publication in the Federal Register. Originally, in a document from January 8, 2021, an incorrect date was specified pertaining to activities involving marine mammals. Instead of the originally listed date of "January 29, 2021," the correct date should be "February 8, 2021." Being part of the Federal Register (cataloged as 86 FR 7714), this notice ensures that the timeline for these marine mammal-related activities is accurately communicated to those concerned.
Significant Issues or Concerns
Interestingly, this document does not raise significant substantive issues or concerns as it primarily serves as an administrative correction. It lacks comprehensive details about the specifics of marine mammal taking or importing activities. Therefore, it doesn't delve into the potential impacts on marine life or the environmental considerations involved. However, the importance of getting administrative details correct in such notices shouldn't be underestimated, as such details underpin the regulatory processes governing environmental and ecological matters.
Impacts on the Public
For the general public, especially individuals or organizations engaged in marine activities or those advocating for environmental conservation, the document indicates diligence in administrative processes. It ensures that stakeholders operate within the correct timelines, which can be crucial for coordination and compliance with federal regulations. However, due to the nature of this document being corrective in focus, broader public impacts remain peripheral unless one is directly involved with these specific maritime activities.
Impacts on Specific Stakeholders
For stakeholders directly involved in the training activities in the Gulf of Alaska, this correction ensures that they have clarity regarding the timing of their operations. Entities involved in the environmental oversight or operational logistics of these activities will likely appreciate this correction as it helps in maintaining structured and legal conduct of their activities. Conversely, failure to take notice of such corrections could complicate compliance and scheduling, thus underscoring the importance of such administrative updates for stakeholders.
In conclusion, while the notice may seem minor at first glance, the precision it provides plays a crucial role in the structured management of activities impacting marine life. It exemplifies effective bureaucratic functioning that, while sometimes mundane, safeguards accuracy and compliance in environmental governance.
Issues
• The document is a correction notice and does not provide details about any spending, so potential wasteful spending cannot be assessed.
• There is no information in the document text indicating favoritism towards particular organizations or individuals.
• The correction notice is brief and specific, and therefore does not contain unclear or ambiguous language.
• There is no use of complex or difficult language in the provided section; the text is straightforward and clear.