Overview
Title
Receipt of Several Pesticide Petitions Filed for Residues of Pesticide Chemicals in or on Various Commodities (October 2020)
Agencies
ELI5 AI
The EPA made a little fix to a document about pesticides; they changed a date from January 20, 2021, to January 21, 2021, to correct a mistake.
Summary AI
In a proposed rule document by the Environmental Protection Agency, there was a correction concerning pesticide petitions. The correction involved a date change in the document 2020-28117, initially published in the Federal Register on December 21, 2020. The DATES section on page 82998 mistakenly stated "January 20, 2021," which has been corrected to "January 21, 2021."
Keywords AI
Sources
AnalysisAI
The document in question is a proposed rule correction issued by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), as detailed in the Federal Register, under document number 2020-28117. This correction involves a minor but necessary change in the official publication regarding the receipt of several pesticide petitions. The primary focus of this alteration is on a date revision within the document's DATES section, shifting from "January 20, 2021" to "January 21, 2021."
General Summary
The nature of this document is somewhat procedural, dealing with the timelines associated with pesticide petitions. Specifically, the correction pertains to the date by which stakeholders, which could include agricultural producers, environmental groups, and other interested parties, are expected to respond or comply with the contents of the original proposed rule.
Significant Issues or Concerns
While the correction made is relatively straightforward—merely changing a date—such changes can have significant procedural implications. Ensuring accurate and complete information in formal publications is crucial for maintaining transparency and accountability, especially when dealing with regulatory frameworks around pesticide residue levels.
One noteworthy aspect is the importance of precision and detail in regulatory publications. Even minor errors, like an incorrect date, can lead to confusion or potential non-compliance by affected parties. This correction arguably enhances the document's clarity and ensures all stakeholders are on the same page timeline-wise.
Impact on the Public
Broadly speaking, members of the general public may not be directly affected by this procedural update unless they are involved in sectors regulated by pesticide controls. However, an accurate government record is a cornerstone of effective governance, which indirectly affects the public by upholding standards and practices that ensure safety, especially in matters involving food safety and agricultural standards.
Impact on Specific Stakeholders
For specific stakeholders such as farmers, pesticide producers, and environmental watchdogs, the correction ensures that deadlines for submissions or compliance are accurate. Farmers and pesticide companies, for example, need to stay keenly aware of such dates to align their practices with federal regulations. Environmental groups might use these timeframes to organize their responses or objections if needed.
In conclusion, while the change addressed in the document may seem minor, it reflects a crucial attention to detail necessary in legal and regulatory frameworks. Such corrections ensure that processes remain fair and transparent, thereby upholding the interests of all parties involved.