FR C1-2020-28107

Overview

Title

Notice Regarding the Applicability of NHTSA FMVSS Test Procedures to Certifying Manufacturers

Agencies

ELI5 AI

In a safety document, there was a mistake where the date "January 20, 2021" was written, but it should have been "January 21, 2021." They fixed it so the information is right.

Summary AI

The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration and the Department of Transportation issued a correction notice related to a previous document published on December 21, 2020. The correction changes the date in the document from "January 20, 2021" to "January 21, 2021," which was originally on page 83143 in the DATES section. This correction ensures the information about applicability of safety test procedures for certifying manufacturers is accurate.

Type: Notice
Citation: 86 FR 2732
Document #: C1-2020-28107
Date:
Volume: 86
Pages: 2732-2732

AnalysisAI

The document under review is a notice from the Federal Register that includes a correction by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) and the Department of Transportation. The document corrects a date in a previously issued notice regarding safety test procedures applicable to certifying vehicle manufacturers.

Summary of the Document

The original notice was published on December 21, 2020, and the correction amends the date mentioned from January 20, 2021, to January 21, 2021. This correction is significant for ensuring accuracy in the timeline related to the implementation of safety regulations and test procedures for vehicle manufacturers. Such precision is crucial for manufacturers who aim to comply with national safety standards.

Significant Issues or Concerns

One notable concern is the lack of context provided in the correction document. The correction focuses narrowly on changing a date without elaborating on the substance of the original notice. This omission leaves readers without understanding the nature or significance of the safety procedures in question. Additionally, the document metadata is missing an abstract and specific action details, which further hinders comprehension of the document's full purpose and intended outcomes.

Impact on the Public

For the general public, this correction ensures that there is minimal confusion regarding when compliance with NHTSA safety test procedures begins. Such procedures are vital for maintaining vehicle safety standards that protect consumers on the road. While the impact on everyday citizens may be indirect, precise regulatory timelines can contribute to the introduction of vehicles that meet rigorous safety standards, ultimately promoting public safety.

Impact on Specific Stakeholders

Vehicle Manufacturers: The correction of the date is particularly relevant to vehicle manufacturers who need clear guidance on compliance timelines. An incorrect date could result in premature implementation efforts, increased costs, or a delay in meeting compliance requirements.

Regulatory Bodies: Institutions like the NHTSA must ensure that their published notices are free from errors. Even a minor correction such as this one underscores the importance of accuracy in communicating regulatory changes and expectations.

Auto Industry Analysts and Legal Experts: These stakeholders also benefit from such corrections as they rely on accurate timelines to provide informed analyses and legal guidance to manufacturers and suppliers within the automotive industry.

In conclusion, while this document might seem minor in scope, its implications in terms of regulatory compliance for manufacturers are significant. Clarity and accuracy in regulatory communication ensure a smooth transition within the manufacturing processes, ultimately leading to safer consumer products.

Issues

  • • The document metadata lacks an abstract, which can aid in the quick understanding of the document's purpose and content.

  • • The document does not specify any action or intended outcome in the metadata, which could lead to ambiguity regarding its purpose.

  • • The document text references a correction without providing context for what the original notice entailed, leaving readers without background information.

  • • The document only includes one specific date correction without further elaboration, which might be insufficient for understanding the broader implications or content of the original notice.

Statistics

Size

Pages: 1
Words: 95
Sentences: 3
Entities: 12

Language

Nouns: 20
Verbs: 5
Adjectives: 2
Adverbs: 0
Numbers: 20

Complexity

Average Token Length:
3.84
Average Sentence Length:
31.67
Token Entropy:
3.90
Readability (ARI):
14.88

Reading Time

less than a minute