FR C1-2020-28000

Overview

Title

Agency Information Collection Activities; Submission to the Office of Management and Budget for Review and Approval; Comment Request; Quarterly Budget and Expenditure Reporting Under CARES Act Sections 18004(a)(1) Institutional Portion, 18004(a)(2), and 18004(a)(3)

Agencies

ELI5 AI

The Education Department made a little fix to a notice about how schools report their spending money from the CARES Act. They changed the date from January 20, 2021, to January 21, 2021, so everyone has the correct day to look at.

Summary AI

The Education Department issued a correction for a previous notice regarding budget and expenditure reporting under the CARES Act. The correction changes the date in the DATES section from "January 20, 2021," to "January 21, 2021." This update is meant to ensure the accurate recording of relevant dates for institutional reporting requirements. The original notice appeared in the December 21, 2020, issue of the Federal Register.

Type: Notice
Citation: 86 FR 2658
Document #: C1-2020-28000
Date:
Volume: 86
Pages: 2658-2658

AnalysisAI

In the rapidly evolving context of regulatory notices and federal government requirements, a recently published document by the Education Department has captured attention. The document in question is a correction notice appearing in the Federal Register concerning budget and expenditure reporting under the CARES Act. Specifically, this document modifies a date in the original notice, ensuring the precise recording of important deadlines related to institutional reporting.

General Summary

This correction notice, published with the document number C1-2020-28000, deals simply with altering a date: it changes the deadline from "January 20, 2021," to "January 21, 2021." This amendment appears in a section of the original document specifically designated for key dates. By revising this, the Education Department aims to prevent any potential misunderstanding or logistical errors in how institutions plan and execute their budgetary and expenditure reporting responsibilities as stipulated under the CARES Act.

Significant Issues or Concerns

The correction does not present detailed information on financial aspects or complex regulatory changes but is purely administrative. Thus, it avoids any intricate language or provisions that might lead to confusion or misinterpretation. The simplicity of the notice means there are virtually no additional concerns beyond ensuring that the affected parties are aware of this change and incorporate it into their compliance schedules.

Impact on the Public Broadly

For the general public, this notice might appear minor. However, it symbolizes the precision needed within governmental processes and how deadlines, even when off by a single day, could affect planning and operations within institutions. For stakeholders such as educational entities receiving funding or obligated to financial reporting under the CARES Act, this correction is crucial. It ensures their reporting activities align accurately with federal guidelines.

Impact on Specific Stakeholders

The most affected parties are educational institutions tasked with budget reporting as per the specific sections of the CARES Act referenced. For these institutions, this date correction is necessary to synchronize their administrative processes with regulatory expectations. A failure to note this change could lead to unnecessary stress or complications in compliance efforts. Hence, the update represents a critical point of attention for those handling institutional finances and reporting responsibilities.

In conclusion, while seemingly minor, this correction serves an essential function in maintaining clarity and ensuring the smooth operation of institutional reporting tasks. With the corrected deadline now clarified, institutions can better align their schedules and ensure compliance with federal requirements.

Issues

  • • The document is a correction notice and does not contain detailed information on spending, so it's not possible to assess wasteful spending or favoritism.

  • • The text in the document is clear, concise, and not overly complex as it primarily addresses a date correction.

  • • There are no detailed sections in the document that would potentially contain unclear or ambiguous language, as it only corrects a previous date.

  • • No issues related to the spending or language complexity can be identified due to the limited nature of the text provided.

Statistics

Size

Pages: 1
Words: 91
Sentences: 3
Entities: 11

Language

Nouns: 20
Verbs: 5
Adjectives: 2
Adverbs: 0
Numbers: 18

Complexity

Average Token Length:
3.91
Average Sentence Length:
30.33
Token Entropy:
3.82
Readability (ARI):
14.60

Reading Time

less than a minute