FR C1-2020-27300

The document in question involves a correction issued by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) concerning a proposed rule about the incidental take of marine mammals during U.S. Navy construction activities at Naval Station Norfolk in Virginia. This correction specifically updates the deadline for public comments, extending it from January 20, 2021, to January 21, 2021.

General Summary

The proposed rule pertains to activities relating to the U.S. Navy's construction projects at Naval Station Norfolk. These activities have the potential to accidentally harm or "take" marine mammals, a term which includes actions like harassment or injury. The proposed rule likely outlines measures to mitigate these impacts. However, the correction document itself does not delve into the specifics of the original proposal, focusing instead on amending an administrative detail.

Significant Issues or Concerns

One notable issue highlighted by the correction is an oversight in the original publication related to the comment deadline. While not uncommon, such errors can affect public participation by providing unclear timelines, thereby potentially impeding stakeholders' ability to adequately respond to proposed rules. Additionally, the document does not give any substantial information about the activities that might affect marine mammals or the measures to address these concerns, leaving the public in the dark about the proposed rule's potential environmental or economic implications.

Impact on the Public

The corrected document directly impacts the general public by providing a revised deadline for submitting written comments. This extension grants individuals and organizations an extra day to formulate and submit their feedback, fostering a more inclusive dialogue concerning environmental governance. Public participation is crucial in regulatory processes, especially when activities may affect ecosystems and local communities.

Impact on Specific Stakeholders

For certain stakeholders, such as environmental advocacy groups and organizations involved in wildlife conservation, this document underscores the need for vigilance in monitoring governmental publications. The change in the comment period ensures that these stakeholders have enough time to evaluate the proposals comprehensively and advocate for the protection of marine life.

Conversely, stakeholders connected to the construction operations at the naval station, including contractors and the Navy, might view the extended deadline as a minor delay in their project timeline. However, the opportunity for more thorough public input might facilitate a smoother implementation by addressing potential concerns proactively.

In conclusion, while this document highlights a simple clerical adjustment, it underscores broader themes of regulatory transparency, stakeholder involvement, and the intricate balance of marine conservation with military and industrial activities.