FR 2025-07657

Ampersand Gilman Hydro, LP has submitted an application to renew its license for the Gilman Hydroelectric Project, a 4.95-megawatt facility located on the Connecticut River between Vermont and New Hampshire. The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) is handling the process and has indicated its plans to prepare an Environmental Assessment (EA) for this project. The agency has declared that it does not expect the licensing to have a significant environmental impact, based on collected data and comments.

General Summary

The Gilman Hydroelectric Project is undergoing a licensing renewal process, and FERC is tasked with evaluating the environmental impact through an EA. Such assessments are crucial in determining whether the project will meet environmental standards and safeguard local ecosystems. This document primarily informs stakeholders and the public about the intent to prepare the EA and the forthcoming steps in the licensing procedure. An EA is less comprehensive than a full Environmental Impact Statement (EIS), often used when projects are expected to have limited environmental effects. FERC plans to issue the EA for public feedback, where community insights and concerns will be considered before making a final decision.

Significant Issues and Concerns

One major oversight in this notice is the absence of specific details regarding the estimated cost or budget for preparing the EA. This lack of transparency might lead to concerns about potential inefficiencies or unexplained spending, which are critical issues for public funds management.

Additionally, the document does not thoroughly explain why the project is anticipated not to qualify as a major federal action affecting the human environment, leaving ambiguity around the environmental evaluation. For the public and stakeholders, understanding the reasoning behind such determinations is essential to gaining trust in the process.

Furthermore, technical jargon, such as "readiness for environmental analysis (REA) notice" and unique identification numbers related to the National Environmental Policy Act, are used without adequate explanation. This lack of clarity might hinder the public's ability to fully comprehend the process and engage effectively.

Impact on the Public

For the general public, this document signifies an opportunity to participate in the decision-making process regarding the environmental management of a local hydroelectric project. The transparency and inclusiveness of such assessments can foster public confidence in regulatory actions. However, the complexity of the language and lack of detailed explanations might limit meaningful participation and understanding.

Impact on Specific Stakeholders

For local residents, especially those living near the project area, the EA represents an opportunity to voice concerns or support for the project following their environmental and community priorities. Community organizations and environmental groups may scrutinize the EA for any oversights in terms of impacts on local wildlife, water quality, or land use changes.

On the other hand, Ampersand Gilman Hydro, LP would be directly affected by this process as it seeks to renew its operational license. The company has an interest in demonstrating compliance with environmental regulations to continue its operations seamlessly.

In conclusion, while the document lays out the necessary groundwork for proceeding with an environmental review, greater transparency and clarity would enhance public understanding and participation in the environmental decision-making process.