FR 2025-07651

Overview

Title

Noise Compatibility Program for Antonio B. Won Pat International Airport, Tamuning, Guam

Agencies

ELI5 AI

The government looked at a map showing which areas near the Guam airport are noisy because of airplanes and said the map was okay, but this doesn't mean they've agreed to fix or pay for the noise problem.

Summary AI

The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) has determined that the noise exposure map submitted by the Antonio B. Won Pat International Airport Authority for the Antonio B. Won Pat International Airport in Guam complies with legal requirements, as of April 28, 2025. This map shows areas affected by airport noise and details future aircraft operations. The current map and future prediction, along with supporting documents, meet federal standards. However, while the FAA has accepted this map, it's not an approval of the airport's plans to manage noise levels, nor a promise to fund such efforts.

Abstract

The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) announces its determination that the noise exposure map submitted by the Antonio B. Won Pat International Airport Authority for the Antonio B. Won Pat International Airport is compliant with applicable statutory and regulatory requirements.

Type: Notice
Citation: 90 FR 18888
Document #: 2025-07651
Date:
Volume: 90
Pages: 18888-18889

AnalysisAI

The document under review is a formal notice from the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), part of the U.S. Department of Transportation. It announces the FAA's determination that the noise exposure map submitted by the Antonio B. Won Pat International Airport Authority for the airport in Guam complies with relevant legal and regulatory standards. This decision reflects an administrative milestone in managing aircraft noise levels, as of April 28, 2025.

General Summary

The determination by the FAA signifies that the noise exposure map meets the necessary statutory and regulatory requirements. The map in question illustrates the noise impact areas around the airport and outlines the expected aircraft operations in the near future. By complying with the federal stipulations, the documentation, which includes both current and future noise exposure conditions, is now official. However, while the FAA has accepted the noise exposure map, it is crucial to note that this does not constitute an endorsement of the airport authority’s plans for noise management, nor does it imply any financial support for such initiatives.

Significant Issues and Concerns

One of the primary concerns is the complexity of the document, heavily laden with legal and technical jargon. References to specific sections of the U.S. Code and the Code of Federal Regulations may be challenging for individuals without legal or technical expertise to understand. Furthermore, the document does not elaborate on what is meant by "non-compatible uses," leading to potential ambiguities about how the noise exposure affects nearby areas. Additionally, the lack of information regarding budget allocations or potential financing for noise compatibility programs leaves questions about how these initiatives might be implemented effectively.

Impact on the Public

For the general public, especially those living near the Antonio B. Won Pat International Airport, this determination could mean changes in how noise from aircraft operations is perceived and managed. The acceptance of the noise map sets a baseline for regulatory standards, which local communities might refer to when addressing noise-related issues. The document indicates that local authorities will continue to have control over planning and managing land use in affected areas, emphasizing that community consultations and public reviews were part of the map’s creation process.

Impact on Stakeholders

Specific stakeholders, such as local government agencies, planners, and residents near the airport, might be directly influenced by the FAA's acceptance of the noise map. For them, it provides a documented framework that could support future planning and zoning decisions. However, since this document does not provide funding for noise reduction measures, stakeholders may need to seek other resources to implement comprehensive noise management strategies. The absence of specific benefits to organizations or individuals from this acceptance raises questions about who will ultimately shoulder the responsibility and costs associated with noise compatibility programs.

In summary, while the FAA's acceptance of the noise exposure map represents a procedural step forward, it also underscores the importance of clarity in regulatory documents and the need for effective communication with affected communities and stakeholders.

Issues

  • • The document does not mention any specific budget or spending detail related to the noise exposure map or any subsequent noise compatibility program, making it difficult to assess potential wasteful spending.

  • • The document does not clearly specify any direct benefit to particular organizations or individuals, but this could be due to lack of information on who might benefit from the FAA's acceptance of the NEM.

  • • The language used in explaining the FAA's acceptance and limitations regarding the noise exposure map is complex and may be difficult for individuals lacking technical or legal expertise to fully understand.

  • • The document heavily references legal and technical statutes, which could make comprehension challenging without prior knowledge of 49 U.S.C. 47503, 47506, or 14 CFR part 150.

  • • There is no detailed explanation of what constitutes 'non-compatible uses' within the context of the NEM, leaving the interpretation open to ambiguity.

Statistics

Size

Pages: 2
Words: 1,010
Sentences: 28
Entities: 87

Language

Nouns: 394
Verbs: 72
Adjectives: 52
Adverbs: 4
Numbers: 62

Complexity

Average Token Length:
4.87
Average Sentence Length:
36.07
Token Entropy:
5.13
Readability (ARI):
23.34

Reading Time

about 4 minutes