Overview
Title
Data Collection Available for Public Comments
Agencies
ELI5 AI
The Small Business Administration wants to get permission to ask people for some information and is inviting everyone to share their thoughts about it before they start. They have a month for people to say whether asking for this information is a good idea or if it might be too much work for small businesses.
Summary AI
The Small Business Administration (SBA) plans to seek approval from the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) to gather information as outlined in their notice. In compliance with the Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA), this notice allows for a 30-day public comment period before the collection of information is submitted to OMB. The SBA seeks feedback on the necessity and impact of the information collection to ensure it's efficient and beneficial, without being burdensome. Comments should be sent to Bethany Shana at the Office of Credit Risk Management by July 1, 2025.
Abstract
The Small Business Administration (SBA) intends to request approval, from the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for the collection of information described below. The Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) requires federal agencies to publish a notice in the Federal Register concerning each proposed collection of information before submission to OMB, and to allow 30 days for public comment in response to the notice. This notice complies with that requirement.
Keywords AI
Sources
AnalysisAI
Summary of the Document
The document is a notice from the Small Business Administration (SBA), announcing its intent to seek approval from the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for collecting certain information. This is in adherence to the Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA), which mandates that federal agencies publish notices in the Federal Register for proposed information collections, allowing a 30-day period for public comment. The SBA is reaching out to the public to gather feedback on the collection of information, specifically regarding its necessity, accuracy, and ways to minimize its burden while enhancing its quality and clarity. Comments are directed to be sent to Bethany Shana at the Office of Credit Risk Management by July 1, 2025.
Significant Issues and Concerns
There are several critical issues with the document that warrant attention:
Lack of Detail on Information Collection: The document does not explain the specifics of what information will be collected, making it difficult to assess its necessity or impact on stakeholders.
Security Concerns: There is no mention of how the SBA plans to secure and protect the collected information, potentially raising privacy concerns for participants.
Ambiguity in Terminology: Phrases like "unnecessary, unreasonable or prohibitive fees" are mentioned without clear definitions, which could lead to varied interpretations.
Undefined Role of Agents: The term "Agents" is used without explaining who qualifies as an agent in this context, leading to ambiguity about the parties involved.
Burden Estimate Clarity: The document lacks a detailed breakdown of the time or cost involved in responding to the information collection, making it hard to evaluate the true impact on small businesses.
Lack of Discussion on Benefits and Drawbacks: There is no information provided on the potential benefits or drawbacks of the proposed information collection, which hinders the public's ability to provide meaningful comments.
Impact on the Public
The document primarily aims to gather public feedback on the proposed information collection by the SBA. Ideally, if implemented efficiently, this could ensure that businesses are not subjected to excessive bureaucratic requirements, helping to streamline processes and reduce unnecessary costs. However, the lack of clarity and detailed information might hinder the public's ability to provide constructive feedback. This could lead to an ineffective consultation process, where significant issues might remain unaddressed.
Impact on Specific Stakeholders
For small businesses, the document's lack of detail and clarity could result in increased uncertainty and apprehension regarding the potential administrative burden. The absence of a clear benefit discussion denies them the ability to properly weigh the costs against potential efficiency and service improvements. Conversely, the potential exists for the process to foster more transparent fee structures and reduce exploitative fees, benefiting these businesses if the SBA collects and uses the information effectively.
For agents working with the SBA, defining their roles and the expectations within the information collection process remains vague. A clearer understanding of their responsibilities and the intended monitoring could help alleviate compliance concerns and align expectations.
In summary, while the document aims to engage public participation in improving SBA's processes, it falls short in providing the necessary information that stakeholders need for informed commentary, potentially limiting the benefits of the proposed actions.
Issues
• The document does not specify the nature or scope of the information collection, making it difficult to assess its necessity or impact.
• There is no specific mention of how the SBA will ensure the information collected is secure and protected.
• The document does not provide specific examples or definitions of 'unnecessary, unreasonable or prohibitive fees,' which could lead to ambiguity in interpretation.
• The document refers to 'Agents' without clear explanation of who qualifies as an agent in this context.
• The burden estimates do not provide a breakdown of time or cost involved in responding to the information collection, which makes it hard to assess the impact on small businesses.
• There is no discussion on the potential benefits or drawbacks of the proposed information collection, making it difficult for the public to provide informed comments.