Overview
Title
Correction to Statutory Citation
Agencies
ELI5 AI
The Office of Special Counsel fixed a small mistake by changing a reference in its rules to point to the right year, 1996 instead of 1998, so people know which law they mean when dealing with certain workplace complaints.
Summary AI
The U.S. Office of Special Counsel (OSC) has issued a technical amendment to correct a mistake in one of its regulations. The regulation involved is about how complaints concerning prohibited personnel practices are filed, and the OSC fixed the citation of a law to reference the correct version, the Administrative Dispute Resolution Act of 1996 instead of 1998. This change is effective immediately because it is considered non-substantive and in the public's best interest to address it swiftly.
Abstract
The U.S. Office of Special Counsel is issuing this technical amendment to correct a statutory citation in its regulation governing the filing of complaints of prohibited personnel practices and other prohibited activities.
Keywords AI
Sources
AnalysisAI
The document in question from the Federal Register involves a technical amendment issued by the U.S. Office of Special Counsel (OSC). This amendment is specifically intended to correct a citation error in the OSC's regulation that deals with the filing of complaints regarding prohibited personnel practices and other related violations by federal agencies.
General Summary
The OSC has identified and corrected an incorrect statutory citation within its existing regulations. The current regulation incorrectly referred to the Administrative Dispute Resolution Act of 1998, whereas the correct reference should have been the Administrative Dispute Resolution Act of 1996. This correction, which affects 5 CFR Part 1800, is purely technical and non-substantive, hence it was implemented immediately to ensure the regulation accurately reflects the appropriate law.
Significant Issues or Concerns
The primary issue addressed in this document pertains to the accuracy of legal references within federal regulations. The importance of such corrections cannot be understated, as incorrect citations may lead to legal misunderstandings or misapplications. By ensuring that the correct version of the statute is cited, the OSC aids in maintaining the integrity and reliability of the legal framework governing federal personnel practices.
Impact on the Public
For the general public, especially current and former federal employees and applicants for federal employment, the correction ensures clarity and precision in understanding the legal pathways available for filing complaints related to prohibited personnel practices. The swiftness of this amendment's implementation underscores the OSC's commitment to transparency and accuracy, reinforcing public trust in how federal regulations are maintained and updated.
Impact on Specific Stakeholders
Specific stakeholders, such as federal employees or applicants who may wish to file a complaint, benefit directly from this correction. They can be assured that the procedures they follow are grounded in correctly cited laws, thus minimizing confusion and supporting fair outcomes. Moreover, legal practitioners who guide clients through these proceedings will find their interpretative work more straightforward and reliable, fostering smoother processes for resolving disputes.
In conclusion, while the amendment is technical in nature, it plays a critical role in ensuring that the regulatory framework for handling federal personnel disputes is precise and dependable. Its immediate implementation reflects the OSC's dedication to upholding the accountability and transparency of governmental processes.