FR 2025-07442

Overview

Title

Taking and Importing Marine Mammals; Taking Marine Mammals Incidental to Geophysical Surveys Related to Oil and Gas Activities in the Gulf of America (formerly Gulf of Mexico)

Agencies

ELI5 AI

The government is letting a company called WesternGeco have extra time, until June 30, 2025, to safely look for oil in the Gulf of America without hurting the dolphins and other sea animals too much. They made sure this won’t cause big problems for the animals living there.

Summary AI

The National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) has adjusted the expiration date of a Letter of Authorization (LOA) given to WesternGeco to extend their permission to incidentally take marine mammals during geophysical surveys for oil and gas in the Gulf of America until June 30, 2025. This change allows WesternGeco more time to complete their projects after delays caused by weather. NMFS confirmed that the surveys would not harm the marine mammals significantly, and that the extension is consistent with existing laws and regulations. The Gulf of Mexico is now officially referred to as the Gulf of America, according to updated directives.

Abstract

In accordance with the Marine Mammal Protection Act (MMPA), as amended, its implementing regulations, and NMFS' MMPA regulations for taking marine mammals incidental to geophysical surveys related to oil and gas activities in the Gulf of America, originally published as "Taking Marine Mammals Incidental to Geophysical Surveys Related to Oil and Gas Activities in the Gulf of Mexico," notification is hereby given that NMFS has modified the expiration date of a Letter of Authorization (LOA) issued to WesternGeco for the taking of marine mammals incidental to geophysical survey activity in the Gulf of America (GOA).

Type: Notice
Citation: 90 FR 17911
Document #: 2025-07442
Date:
Volume: 90
Pages: 17911-17913

AnalysisAI

The document from the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) is a notification regarding the modification of a Letter of Authorization (LOA) for WesternGeco, allowing them more time to conduct geophysical surveys for oil and gas activities in the Gulf of America. This extension moves the expiration date to June 30, 2025, providing additional time due to weather-related delays.

General Summary

The National Marine Fisheries Service has decided to extend the LOA for WesternGeco, enabling the incidental taking of marine mammals during their surveys. This decision is anchored in compliance with the Marine Mammal Protection Act (MMPA) and aims to ensure the activities do not significantly harm marine mammal populations in the region. The document underlines the application of various regulatory provisions designed to protect these species while accommodating industrial activities. Notably, this notification also aligns with recent administrative changes that result in renaming the Gulf of Mexico to the Gulf of America.

Significant Issues and Concerns

One of the main issues with this notification is the lack of detailed justification for extending the expiration of the LOA. While the LOA's extension appears necessary due to weather delays, the document does not adequately clarify how this aligns with marine mammal protection goals. Moreover, the term "negligible impact" is used repeatedly, but it is subjective and lacks a clear, quantitative definition, which could lead to differing interpretations of its implications for marine mammal safety.

Additionally, the document references changes in take estimates without providing specific details or numerical comparisons between the original and updated projections. This lack of transparency may lead to ambiguity about the potential impacts on marine mammal populations. Furthermore, while the document excludes the Rice's whale from authorized taking due to its assumed rarity, it lacks robust, recent statistical evidence to support this assumption, leaving readers with unanswered questions about the whale's vulnerability.

Public Impact

For the general public, this document highlights the ongoing integration of industrial activities with environmental protection efforts. The extension of the LOA may raise concerns about the balance between economic interests in oil and gas exploration and the need to safeguard marine ecosystems. The change in nomenclature from the Gulf of Mexico to the Gulf of America could lead to confusion, as many people continue to identify the region by its former name. This could require additional public communication efforts to ensure clarity.

Impact on Stakeholders

For stakeholders directly involved, such as WesternGeco and other industry operators, the extension provides critical additional time to complete their survey projects without running afoul of regulatory deadlines. This extension could positively impact WesternGeco from an operational standpoint, mitigating potential financial losses due to weather-induced delays.

Conversely, environmental advocates and marine conservationists may view this modification with skepticism, concerned that extending industrial activities might increase the risk to marine mammals, particularly if the true impact estimates are not transparently communicated. They might call for more stringent oversight and detailed environmental impact assessments to ensure the protection of vulnerable species in these waters.

In summary, while the NMFS's decision aims to balance industrial and environmental priorities, it leaves open questions regarding transparency and the absence of detailed impact evaluations, which are crucial for gaining broad public trust and ensuring robust marine conservation efforts.

Issues

  • • The modification of the expiration date of the Letter of Authorization (LOA) is not clearly justified in terms of its impact on marine mammal protection.

  • • The use of the term 'negligible impact' might be subjective and lacks a clear quantitative definition in the context of the document.

  • • References to the original and modified take estimates are made, but details about the differences or specific numerical changes in projections are not provided, potentially leading to ambiguity.

  • • The justification for not authorizing the take of Rice's whale due to assumed rarity is not supported with extensive recent data or statistical evidence in the document.

  • • The document mentions scalar ratios to better reflect individual takes but does not explain the methodology or provide specific examples, which might make it difficult to understand the basis for 'small numbers' determinations.

  • • References to Executive Order 14172 and Department of the Interior Secretarial Order 3423 changing the name from 'Gulf of Mexico' to 'Gulf of America' might confuse readers familiar with the original name.

  • • The document uses technical terms such as '3D OBN survey' and 'Gemini enhanced frequency source' without providing layperson-friendly explanations.

  • • The document includes several references to Federal Register notices and reports without summarizing key findings or data, expecting the reader to locate and review these external documents.

Statistics

Size

Pages: 3
Words: 2,469
Sentences: 65
Entities: 179

Language

Nouns: 738
Verbs: 213
Adjectives: 178
Adverbs: 48
Numbers: 131

Complexity

Average Token Length:
4.90
Average Sentence Length:
37.98
Token Entropy:
5.54
Readability (ARI):
24.42

Reading Time

about 10 minutes