FR 2025-07319

Overview

Title

Agency Information Collection Activities; Proposed Collection; Comment Request; Prohibition on Funding of Unlawful Internet Gambling

Agencies

ELI5 AI

The Department of the Treasury wants to know what people think about some rules they use to stop people from playing illegal gambling games on the internet. They want to make sure these rules aren't too hard to follow and are asking folks to share their thoughts by the end of June.

Summary AI

The Department of the Treasury is requesting public comments on a proposed information collection project designed to reduce paperwork and respondent burden, in line with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995. This project is related to the implementation of regulations under the Unlawful Internet Gambling Enforcement Act of 2006, which aims to prevent illegal internet gambling transactions. They are seeking input on the necessity and usefulness of the information collection, as well as suggestions for reducing the burden on respondents. Feedback is required by June 30, 2025, and comments will be included in a request for approval from the Office of Management and Budget.

Abstract

The Department of the Treasury, as part of its continuing effort to reduce paperwork and respondent burden, invites the general public and other federal agencies to comment on the proposed information collection listed below, in accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.

Type: Notice
Citation: 90 FR 17882
Document #: 2025-07319
Date:
Volume: 90
Pages: 17882-17883

AnalysisAI

The document from the Federal Register involves a request for public comment by the U.S. Department of the Treasury on a proposed information collection, aligned with the mandates of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995. This proposal seeks the general public and federal agencies’ input on regulations under the Unlawful Internet Gambling Enforcement Act of 2006. The main objective is to curb illegal internet gambling transactions through policies and procedures implemented by designated payment systems. Public comments are particularly encouraged on the necessity and effectiveness of the information collection and any suggestions to reduce respondent burden. Feedback will be summarized and included in an approval request to the Office of Management and Budget, due by June 30, 2025.

Significant Issues and Concerns

There are several notable issues concerning this proposal. Firstly, the estimated time requirement for establishing new policies and procedures is noted as 100 hours, with an additional 8 hours for maintenance. This could potentially be burdensome for businesses, particularly smaller enterprises that might not have such resources readily available.

Secondly, the document lacks clear examples or guidance on what constitutes "reasonably designed policies and procedures." This could lead to varied interpretations and inconsistent practices among different businesses, potentially complicating compliance efforts.

Additionally, the notice mentions the necessity for estimates concerning capital or start-up costs and ongoing operational expenses, yet these details are not explicitly provided, which may cause concern due to potential hidden costs.

Moreover, the use of terms such as "restricted transactions" without clear definitions can lead to confusion. Respondents might find it challenging to determine precisely what transactions are considered restricted under the Act.

Lastly, the proposal is an extension of a currently approved collection without any changes, suggesting a lack of thorough review to assess whether the requirements continue to be relevant or could be refined.

Broad Public Impact

From a broader perspective, the document impacts public understanding and compliance with regulations aimed at preventing unlawful internet gambling. The processes to comply with this regulation could increase operational transparency among payment systems, ultimately contributing to a reduction in unlawful activities. However, the potential complexity and burden of compliance could be a deterrent for new entrants into the market, potentially stifling innovation and competition.

Impact on Specific Stakeholders

For businesses directly affected, primarily those involved in payment systems, the document implies significant administrative responsibilities. They might face increased operational costs and resource allocations toward compliance efforts. Such demands could be particularly challenging for small businesses with limited resources.

Conversely, the document positively impacts regulatory bodies as it facilitates oversight and enforcement of gambling laws, promoting lawful economic activities. For the general public, successfully minimizing unlawful internet gambling through comprehensive enforcement could foster a safer, more secure online financial environment.

In summary, while the document’s goals align with important regulatory objectives, the potential impacts on businesses and the ambiguity in implementation requirements suggest the need for careful reconsideration and possible refinement to ensure balanced and effective regulation.

Issues

  • • The document includes an estimated time of 100 hours to establish new policies and procedures, and 8 hours to maintain them, which may be perceived as potentially excessive and could impose a significant burden on businesses.

  • • The document does not provide any specific examples or guidance on what constitutes 'reasonably designed policies and procedures' for preventing unlawful internet gambling, which might lead to ambiguity and inconsistent implementation among different respondents.

  • • The invitation for comments includes a section for 'estimates of capital or start-up costs and costs of operation, maintenance, and purchase of services required to provide information.' This implies potential hidden costs that are not explicitly detailed in the notice, which might cause concern among businesses.

  • • The use of terms such as 'restricted transactions' without clear definitions, or examples of what these transactions might entail, can lead to confusion among respondents.

  • • The extension of a currently approved collection without change may indicate a lack of review or analysis of whether the requirements are still necessary or could be improved.

Statistics

Size

Pages: 2
Words: 741
Sentences: 27
Entities: 52

Language

Nouns: 236
Verbs: 64
Adjectives: 18
Adverbs: 8
Numbers: 38

Complexity

Average Token Length:
5.35
Average Sentence Length:
27.44
Token Entropy:
5.07
Readability (ARI):
20.84

Reading Time

about 2 minutes