FR 2025-07268

Overview

Title

Airworthiness Directives; The Boeing Company Airplanes

Agencies

ELI5 AI

The FAA wants to make sure Boeing 717-200 airplanes are safe, so they plan to check a part of the landing gear for cracks regularly. They need people to share their thoughts on this plan before June 13, 2025.

Summary AI

The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) has proposed a new airworthiness directive (AD) for all Boeing 717-200 airplanes in response to a reported landing issue involving the nose gear not extending. This AD requires regular inspections for cracks in the upper lock link assembly, which caused the landing gear problem due to non-conforming surface roughness. Failure to address this issue could result in further nose gear malfunctions, affecting ground maneuverability and safety during landings. The FAA is seeking public comments on this proposed rule by June 13, 2025.

Abstract

The FAA proposes to adopt a new airworthiness directive (AD) for all The Boeing Company Model 717-200 airplanes. This proposed AD was prompted by a report of a nose landing gear-up landing caused by the failure of the upper lock link assembly. This proposed AD would require repetitive inspections for cracking of the upper lock link assembly and applicable on-condition actions. The FAA is proposing this AD to address the unsafe condition on these products.

Citation: 90 FR 17746
Document #: 2025-07268
Date:
Volume: 90
Pages: 17746-17749

AnalysisAI

The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) has put forward a new regulation concerning the Boeing 717-200 airplanes, predominantly focusing on potential landing gear issues. This document, known as a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM), is essential for ensuring air safety, as it targets mechanical failures that could compromise aircraft operations during landings. Specifically, the FAA is concerned with the upper lock link assembly in the landing gear, which has been associated with a failure to extend the nose landing gear correctly—leading to potentially serious safety risks.

Summary of the Proposed Rule

The FAA's proposal necessitates recurring inspections to detect any structural cracking in the upper lock link assembly of the landing gear. This component's failure, as identified in previous incidents, was due to non-compliant surface conditions leading to unsuccessful deployment of landing gears. Should these structural issues not be resolved, they could lead to further malfunctions, restricting aircraft operability on the ground and significantly increasing the risk of landing incidents.

Moreover, the FAA is inviting the public and industry stakeholders to provide feedback on this proposed rule by June 13, 2025. Feedback from parties affected by these regulations can help refine and potentially enhance the implementation of the final directive.

Issues and Concerns

There are several noteworthy issues within this document. First, while the NPRM lays the groundwork for necessary corrective actions, it does not yet specify the costs involved in potential replacements. This could pose challenges for airlines and operators in financial forecasting and budgeting, especially if substantial costs are involved.

The text is also highly technical, likely making it difficult for the general public to engage fully. This may hamper broader public involvement and understanding of the proposed measures unless additional, more accessible explanations are provided.

Another significant concern is the lack of explicit information on the economic impact, particularly on smaller operators. This omission could put additional strain on smaller aviation businesses, which might already be dealing with tight financial margins.

Impact on the Public

This proposed rule primarily impacts the aviation sector, with the broader public likely experiencing indirect effects. The directive aims to enhance air travel safety, ensuring smooth and uneventful landings. However, airlines might pass on the costs of compliance to consumers through higher ticket prices if the required inspections and replacements are costly.

Impact on Stakeholders

For airlines operating Boeing 717-200 aircraft, this directive means added operational procedures in terms of inspections and possible component replacements. While this enhances safety, it could also translate into increased maintenance costs, potentially stretching resources—especially for airlines with a large fleet of this model.

For passengers, the positive implications lie in the reduced risk of incidents related to landing gear failures. However, in the long run, should airlines need to invest significantly in compliance, there might be an increase in airfare to mitigate these costs.

In conclusion, while the FAA's proposal is a proactive step towards enhancing aviation safety, the lack of detailed financial implications and the technical nature of the document could impede practical adaptability and stakeholder engagement. The public commentary period is crucial and provides a platform for voices from all corners of the industry to impact the final rule positively.

Issues

  • • Document is a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, meaning it does not yet involve spending but sets the stage for required actions that could incur costs.

  • • The document lacks specific cost estimates for the necessary replacements, which might affect budgeting and financial planning for operators.

  • • The language is technical and may be difficult for those outside the aviation industry to fully understand, potentially limiting public engagement.

  • • There is no explicit estimate of the economic impact on different sizes of operations, especially smaller entities.

  • • The document does not provide alternative approaches to mitigate the issue that might be more cost-effective.

  • • The process for submitting comments include various methods, but it might still be cumbersome for individuals without internet access or those unfamiliar with bureaucratic procedures.

Statistics

Size

Pages: 4
Words: 2,847
Sentences: 85
Entities: 237

Language

Nouns: 940
Verbs: 248
Adjectives: 117
Adverbs: 25
Numbers: 166

Complexity

Average Token Length:
4.73
Average Sentence Length:
33.49
Token Entropy:
5.62
Readability (ARI):
21.08

Reading Time

about 10 minutes