FR 2025-07257

Overview

Title

Agency Information Collection Activities; Submission to the Office of Management and Budget for Review and Approval; Comment Request; NESHAP for Solvent Extraction for Vegetable Oil Production (Renewal)

Agencies

ELI5 AI

The EPA wants to keep checking how factories that make vegetable oil use chemicals that can be bad for the air we breathe. They're asking if it's okay to continue collecting some information and want to hear from people about it until May 28, 2025.

Summary AI

The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has submitted a request to extend the information collection on the National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) for facilities involved in the solvent extraction process for vegetable oil production. This extension is submitted to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for approval and seeks public comments until May 28, 2025. The proposed standards apply to facilities that significantly emit hazardous air pollutants and require these entities to comply with various reporting and recordkeeping obligations. The estimated burden on the affected facilities is about 33,000 hours annually, with costs amounting to $4,520,000 each year.

Abstract

The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has submitted an information collection request (ICR), NESHAP for Solvent Extraction for Vegetable Oil Production (EPA ICR Number 1947.11, OMB Control Number 2060-0471) to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for review and approval in accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act. This is a proposed extension of the ICR, which is currently approved through April 30, 2025. Public comments were previously requested via the Federal Register on August 6, 2024 during a 60-day comment period. This notice allows for an additional 30 days for public comments.

Type: Notice
Citation: 90 FR 17595
Document #: 2025-07257
Date:
Volume: 90
Pages: 17595-17595

AnalysisAI

The document in question involves a request from the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to extend the information collection requirements under the National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) specifically for facilities involved in solvent extraction for vegetable oil production. The EPA has submitted this proposal to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for approval and has opened the floor for public comments until May 28, 2025.

General Summary

This notice details an extension of an existing information collection request, which aims to maintain stringent controls and recordkeeping mandates on facilities that emit substantial amounts of hazardous air pollutants during their operations. The proposed standards are not new; they have been in force and are only being renewed. Facilities that fall under this category are required to comply with a series of obligations that include initial notifications, performance tests, and continuous record maintenance to ensure adherence to the relevant environmental guidelines. The expected administrative burden on these facilities is significant, with a projected commitment of 33,000 hours annually and associated costs of $4,520,000 each year.

Significant Issues and Concerns

A notable issue within this document is the lack of a detailed breakdown of the estimated costs, which stand at $4,520,000 annually. Without clear itemization, there could be concerns about potential inefficiencies and transparency in public expenditure. Additionally, the mention of $0 costs associated with annualized capital or operation and maintenance also raises questions about the accuracy of these projections.

Another notable point is the reduction in estimated respondent burden, which is credited to a decrease in the number of sources. However, the document provides no further explanation about this decrease or specifics about which sources are involved and the reasons behind this reduction. This lack of detail might be seen as insufficient transparency.

Impact on the Public

For the general public, the most immediate concern would be related to environmental and health outcomes. Regulation of hazardous emissions from industrial entities, such as those involved in oil production, is crucial for maintaining air quality and public health. By ensuring these facilities adhere to national standards, negative impacts on the environment and subsequent health risks could be minimized.

Impact on Specific Stakeholders

For stakeholders, including the owners and operators of the affected facilities, the document implies continuous regulatory compliance costs and an administrative burden, which may impact their operational bottom line. On the positive side, maintaining compliance assures these stakeholders avoid potential penalties and aligns with broader corporate responsibility goals, particularly in sustainability and environmental stewardship.

For regulatory authorities, the oversight and recordkeeping facilitated by this document provide a structured framework to monitor emissions standards compliance effectively, though concerns about the completeness and clarity of provided details could be improved in future iterations. More clarity on terminologies such as 'startup, shutdown, or malfunction' within regulatory text could aid operators in fulfilling these obligations without ambiguity.

Overall, while the regulatory continuation aligns well with efforts to protect environmental and public health, addressing concerns regarding data transparency and clarity in communication would enhance stakeholder comprehension and compliance efforts.

Financial Assessment

The document addresses the submission of an information collection request (ICR) by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) seeking to extend the National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) regarding solvent extraction for vegetable oil production. The financial aspects of this request are presented briefly in the document.

Financial Summary

The total estimated annual cost for this ICR is $4,520,000 per year. This figure stands out prominently as it represents the financial implications for the facilities involved in the vegetable oil production process that fall under the NESHAP standards. The document indicates that this total cost also includes $0 annualized capital or operation and maintenance costs. While these two aspects are generally significant contributors to any financial estimate, their absence is notable.

Financial Allocations and Identified Issues

One issue identified in the document pertains to the lack of transparency concerning the financial estimate of $4,520,000 per year. There is no detailed breakdown provided to explain how this total cost was determined. For stakeholders and the public alike, understanding the specific allocations within this sum could provide reassurance that funds are used efficiently and not subject to unnecessary or wasteful spending.

Moreover, the statement regarding the $0 annualized capital or operation and maintenance costs is not justified or explained within the document. This absence of costs might appear unusual since facilities typically incur some operation and maintenance expenses. The absence of any such allocation might raise questions about whether these costs are being overlooked or absorbed through other means not disclosed in the document.

The document also mentions a decrease of 1,100 hours in the total estimated respondent burden due to a decrease in the number of sources. However, further details about which sources have decreased and the reasons for these changes are not provided. Understanding such changes could also impact the financial expectations and allocations for the facilities involved, as a change in the number of sources might correspond to a change in compliance costs.

Overall, while the document provides a basic financial estimate for the ICR, it lacks further breakdown and justification for the costs involved, leading to potential concerns about clarity and transparency in financial reporting for this regulatory activity.

Issues

  • • The document does not provide a clear breakdown of the $4,520,000 total estimated cost, which could raise concerns about potential wasteful spending or lack of transparency.

  • • There is no explanation or justification given for the $0 annualized capital or operation & maintenance costs, which could be misleading or require further clarification.

  • • The decrease in the total estimated respondent burden by 1,100 hours is attributed to a decrease in the number of sources but lacks further detail on which sources decreased and why.

  • • The language regarding the requirement for facilities to maintain records could be clearer; terms like 'startup, shutdown, or malfunction' are not defined within this document, which may lead to ambiguity for respondents.

  • • The document uses standard legal references (e.g., '40 CFR part 63, subpart GGGG') without providing a brief explanation or context, potentially limiting accessibility for individuals not familiar with regulatory jargon.

Statistics

Size

Pages: 1
Words: 956
Sentences: 42
Entities: 91

Language

Nouns: 331
Verbs: 59
Adjectives: 38
Adverbs: 17
Numbers: 60

Complexity

Average Token Length:
5.24
Average Sentence Length:
22.76
Token Entropy:
5.30
Readability (ARI):
18.04

Reading Time

about 3 minutes