FR 2025-07086

Overview

Title

Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request

Agencies

ELI5 AI

The Department of Agriculture wants to hear what people think about their plan to collect information from SNAP, a program that helps people get food. They ask people to share their thoughts by May 27, 2025, on how helpful this is, if it's easy to understand, and if it takes too much time.

Summary AI

The Department of Agriculture has submitted a request for public comments on its proposed information collection, which is under review by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) as part of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995. The request seeks feedback about the necessity, accuracy, and potential burden of collecting information related to the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP). Specifically, it involves notifying SNAP participants before their benefits are stored offline or expunged due to account inactivity. Comments must be submitted before May 27, 2025, through the website www.reginfo.gov.

Type: Notice
Citation: 90 FR 17240
Document #: 2025-07086
Date:
Volume: 90
Pages: 17240-17240

AnalysisAI

The document in question is a notice from the Department of Agriculture, seeking public comments on a proposed information collection under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995. This proposal, which is under review by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB), pertains to the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) and specifically addresses procedures for notifying participants about the storage and expungement of unused benefits.

General Summary

The Department of Agriculture aims to gather feedback on whether collecting this information is necessary for its functions and whether the process can be further improved in terms of utility and clarity. As part of this process, the agency is interested in minimizing the burden on respondents through technological means. Public comments are welcome and must be submitted by May 27, 2025, via the website provided.

Significant Issues and Concerns

Several issues arise from this notice, which merit attention. Firstly, the document lacks an abstract that could concisely outline the reasons and objectives behind this information collection, making it harder for the general public to grasp its necessity and scope immediately.

Secondly, potential costs associated with implementing these information collections are not mentioned. Understanding financial implications is vital for stakeholders, particularly for state agencies managing budgets and resources.

Thirdly, there is no information regarding the current validity status or expiration of the OMB control number, which is essential for ensuring compliance. Without this, stakeholders may struggle to understand the legitimacy and compliance requirements of the collection initiative.

Fourthly, it is unclear how feedback will be employed to refine the collection process. This transparency could enhance public confidence in participating, as individuals would understand the impact of their contributions.

Lastly, terms such as 'off-line storage’ and ‘expungement’ might be unclear to individuals unfamiliar with the SNAP processes. This terminological complexity could hinder public understanding and engagement, especially among the program's participants, who may not have specialized knowledge of government procedures.

Broad Public Impact

This document has the potential for widespread impact as it concerns SNAP, a critical support system for millions of individuals and households. By focusing on improving the notification processes related to benefit storage and expungement, these efforts could enhance the efficiency and reliability of benefit distribution, which might ensure that eligible recipients can maintain their benefits without undue administrative hurdles.

Impact on Specific Stakeholders

For state and local agencies, the proposed collection requirements could pose an administrative burden, requiring efficient processes to manage communications with participants. The lack of clarity on costs could affect budgeting and resource allocation, potentially challenging agencies to meet these requirements without incurring unforeseen expenses.

SNAP participants might experience both positive and negative impacts. On the positive side, improved notification processes could reduce the risk of unintentional benefit losses due to inactivity. Nevertheless, if process descriptions remain confusing, participants may face difficulties understanding notices, threatening timely action to safeguard their benefits.

Advocacy groups and community organizations focusing on food security could play a crucial role in supporting SNAP participants, helping them understand and comply with new procedures, while also advocating for more transparent, user-friendly communication from government agencies.

In summary, while the document outlines a relevant initiative to improve the efficiency of SNAP procedures, it would benefit from greater clarity about costs, implementation details, and communication strategies to ensure effective public participation and maintain the utility of this crucial social support program.

Issues

  • • The document does not provide an abstract which could help summarize the purpose and scope of the information collection.

  • • The document lacks specific details on any potential costs associated with the implementation of these information collections, which could help assess the financial impact.

  • • There is no information on whether the OMB control number is currently valid or when it will expire, which is essential for understanding compliance requirements.

  • • The document does not specify how feedback from public comments will be utilized to modify or refine the information collection process.

  • • The language used to describe the process of storage and expunging of benefits, such as 'off-line storage' and 'expungement', might be confusing for individuals unfamiliar with these processes.

  • • There appears to be no mention of any efforts or initiatives to improve access to benefits online, which could reduce reliance on physical mailings and potentially increase efficiency.

Statistics

Size

Pages: 1
Words: 639
Sentences: 21
Entities: 38

Language

Nouns: 224
Verbs: 54
Adjectives: 27
Adverbs: 9
Numbers: 28

Complexity

Average Token Length:
5.35
Average Sentence Length:
30.43
Token Entropy:
5.06
Readability (ARI):
22.77

Reading Time

about 2 minutes