Overview
Title
Request Notice: Use of Foreign-Built Small Passenger Vessel in United States Coastwise Trade, M/V SEAS THE BAY
Agencies
ELI5 AI
The government wants to know if using a new, small foreign boat for trips in the U.S. will upset people who build or run American boats. They are asking everyone to share their thoughts by a certain date.
Summary AI
The Maritime Administration (MARAD), part of the Department of Transportation, is seeking public comments on a request to use a foreign-built small passenger vessel, M/V SEAS THE BAY, in U.S. coastwise trade. This involves deciding whether such use would negatively impact U.S. vessel builders or businesses relying on U.S.-built vessels. The public can submit comments on the proposal by May 23, 2025, through mail or an online portal, ensuring they reference the specific docket number. All comments, including those containing personal information, will be publicly available, although there is an option to request confidential treatment for commercially sensitive information.
Abstract
The Secretary of Transportation, as represented by the Maritime Administration (MARAD), is authorized to make determinations regarding the coastwise use of foreign built; certain U.S. built; and U.S. and foreign rebuilt vessels that solely carry no more than twelve passengers for hire. MARAD has received such a determination request and is publishing this notice to solicit comments to assist with determining whether the proposed use of the vessel set forth in the request would have an adverse effect on U.S. vessel builders or U.S. coastwise trade businesses that use U.S.-built vessels in those businesses. Information about the requestor's vessel, including a description of the proposed service, is in the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section below.
Keywords AI
Sources
AnalysisAI
The document released by the Maritime Administration (MARAD), part of the U.S. Department of Transportation, announces a public comment request regarding the potential use of the foreign-built small passenger vessel, M/V SEAS THE BAY, in U.S. coastwise trade. The central question is whether this usage could negatively impact American vessel builders or businesses that rely on U.S.-built vessels. The public is invited to submit their comments by May 23, 2025, through mail or an online portal, referencing a specific docket number. All comments will be public, but there are provisions for keeping commercially sensitive information confidential.
General Summary
MARAD is tasked with evaluating whether allowing M/V SEAS THE BAY, a foreign-built vessel, to operate in the U.S. coastwise trade could harm U.S. companies involved in vessel building or those using U.S.-built ships. This notice primarily seeks public input to aid in making a well-rounded decision. By participating, stakeholders and other interested parties have an opportunity to influence whether this vessel gets a green light to operate in U.S. waters under these conditions.
Significant Issues
One apparent concern is the absence of specific details about how M/V SEAS THE BAY proposes to operate, which can hinder thoughtful public commentary. Commenters might find it challenging to assess potential impacts without understanding the scale, scope, or nature of the proposed operations.
The document outlines procedures for confidentiality, which appear complex and potentially daunting. The use of technical language may discourage individuals unfamiliar with legal processes from participating fully. A simpler, more straightforward explanation of confidentiality protocols might enhance engagement and clarity.
Impact on the Public
Broadly, this document presents an opportunity for public involvement in maritime regulatory processes. By inviting comments and offering a period for consideration, MARAD empowers individuals and businesses to influence decisions that might affect domestic maritime industries. However, participation might be limited if the processes are seen as too complex or intimidating.
For the general public, the principal impact is indirect. A decision either way might affect the competitiveness of U.S. maritime industries, potentially influencing prices and service availability in regions reliant on coastwise trade.
Impact on Specific Stakeholders
U.S. Vessel Builders and Workers: If the use of M/V SEAS THE BAY is approved, there may be an adverse effect on domestic shipbuilders, as foreign competition could undermine an already delicate balance in this sector. On the other hand, demonstrating minimal adverse impact might highlight resilience and adaptability within the U.S. industry.
Businesses Operating U.S.-Built Vessels: These entities may view the proposed usage as unfair competition. The introduction of foreign-built vessels into U.S. trade could impact their market share and potential profits, particularly if such vessels are allowed without the usual restrictions.
Maritime Administration (MARAD): For the MARAD, this process highlights their role in balancing international maritime activity with domestic economic interests. Navigating these inputs is crucial for maintaining the integrity and competitive viability of U.S. maritime operations.
In conclusion, this document invites public participation in a critical regulatory decision affecting maritime commerce. While the process provides a structured opportunity for input, complexities and lack of detailed operational proposals may hinder active engagement. Stakeholders directly impacted would be wise to participate and voice their assessments of potential economic implications.
Issues
• The document does not provide specific details about the proposed use of the vessel M/V SEAS THE BAY, making it difficult for commenters to fully understand the potential impacts.
• The language regarding submitting comments confidentially is somewhat complex and could benefit from simplification for clarity.
• The document refers to sections and instructions such as Public Participation and ADDRESSES, which might require navigating multiple sections to understand fully, potentially complicating public engagement.
• The procedure for submitting confidential comments is detailed but could be intimidating or unclear to those unfamiliar with confidentiality protocols.
• There is no discussion of potential budgetary implications or cost analysis related to the vessel's use, which might raise concerns about financial oversight.
• The document could include more guidance on how commenters should demonstrate 'undue adverse effects' on U.S. vessel builders or coastwise trade businesses, as this is crucial for a substantive response.