Overview
Title
Request Notice: Use of Foreign-Built Small Passenger Vessel in United States Coastwise Trade, M/V Freedom
Agencies
ELI5 AI
MARAD wants to hear from people about a plan to let a small foreign boat called M/V Freedom carry up to twelve people in the U.S. They need to know if this will hurt American boat makers or businesses.
Summary AI
The Maritime Administration (MARAD) is requesting public comments on a proposal to use a foreign-built small passenger vessel, M/V Freedom, in U.S. coastwise trade. The vessel is allowed to carry up to twelve passengers for hire, and MARAD needs input on whether this would negatively impact U.S. vessel builders or businesses that use American-built vessels. Comments must be submitted by May 23, 2025, and can be provided via the Federal eRulemaking Portal or through mail or hand delivery. All comments will be publicly available, and confidential comments can also be submitted following specific guidelines.
Abstract
The Secretary of Transportation, as represented by the Maritime Administration (MARAD), is authorized to make determinations regarding the coastwise use of foreign built; certain U.S. built; and U.S. and foreign rebuilt vessels that solely carry no more than twelve passengers for hire. MARAD has received such a determination request and is publishing this notice to solicit comments to assist with determining whether the proposed use of the vessel set forth in the request would have an adverse effect on U.S. vessel builders or U.S. coastwise trade businesses that use U.S.-built vessels in those businesses. Information about the requestor's vessel, including a description of the proposed service, is in the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section below.
Keywords AI
Sources
AnalysisAI
Overview of the Notice
The document outlines a request for public comments on a proposal by the Maritime Administration (MARAD) to allow a foreign-built small passenger vessel, known as M/V Freedom, to operate in U.S. coastwise trade. This type of trade involves transporting goods or passengers within the United States. MARAD is responsible for ensuring that such proposals do not negatively impact U.S. industries, particularly those involved in vessel building or coastwise trade using American-built ships.
Key Issues and Concerns
One significant concern about the document is its lack of detail regarding the entity requesting the determination and the specifics of the proposed service by M/V Freedom. Without detailed information, the public may find it challenging to understand the full implications of the proposal and thus may not be able to provide informed feedback.
The document also lacks in-depth discussion about the potential impact on U.S. vessel builders or businesses. This information would be vital for stakeholders who might be affected by the use of a foreign-built vessel in U.S. waters. Additionally, the language used throughout the notice is quite formal and may be difficult for individuals without a background in legal or regulatory language, potentially limiting their ability to participate effectively.
The instructions for submitting comments entail multiple steps, which could be a barrier to participation for some. Simplifying this process might encourage more public commentary.
Another point worth noting is the lack of transparency regarding how MARAD will assess whether the operation of the vessel will have an "undue adverse effect" on U.S. industries. Clarification on this would aid stakeholders in understanding the criteria guiding MARAD’s decision-making process.
Impact on the Public and Stakeholders
For the general public, this notice might seem distant unless they are directly involved in or affected by maritime industries. For businesses relying on American-built vessels, the proposal could pose competition concerns, especially if the foreign-built vessel operates more economically or efficiently.
U.S. vessel builders could view this proposal as a potential threat if it leads to increased acceptance of foreign-built ships, impacting their market share and revenue. Conversely, proponents might argue that allowing more vessels could lower transportation costs and increase service availability, potentially benefiting consumers and other sectors indirectly.
In summary, while the notice is primarily focused on soliciting public opinions, the details within it—or the lack thereof—portray a greater need for clarity and accessibility to foster meaningful participation. The final decision by MARAD could set precedents affecting the maritime industry's structure and competitiveness, emphasizing the importance of thoughtful public and stakeholder engagement in the process.
Issues
• The document does not provide specific information about the entity requesting the determination or details of the vessel service, which may limit public understanding and the ability to comment meaningfully.
• Details regarding the potential impact on U.S. vessel builders or coastwise trade businesses are not provided, which could be crucial for stakeholders assessing the proposal.
• The language used in the notice is formal and might be challenging for individuals who are not familiar with legal or regulatory terminology, potentially limiting public participation.
• The instructions for submitting comments include multiple steps and options, which could be simplified to encourage more public input.
• There is a lack of detail on how MARAD evaluates whether a vessel's operation has an 'undue adverse effect' on U.S. vessel builders, which could create ambiguity about decision-making criteria.