Overview
Title
Request Notice: Use of Foreign-Built Small Passenger Vessel in United States Coastwise Trade, S/V Dragonfly
Agencies
ELI5 AI
A government department is asking people to share their thoughts about whether using a non-American-made boat to take people on trips in U.S. waters is okay, or if it might hurt American boat builders and businesses. They want everyone to send in their ideas by May 23, 2025, but they know it might be a bit tricky for some people to share their thoughts because of the detailed rules.
Summary AI
The Department of Transportation's Maritime Administration (MARAD) has announced a request for public comments on the coastwise use of the foreign-built vessel, S/V Dragonfly, which is proposed to carry no more than twelve passengers for hire in U.S. waters. The notice asks for feedback on whether using this foreign-built vessel will negatively impact U.S. shipbuilders or businesses engaged in coastwise trade using U.S.-built vessels. Interested individuals can submit their comments through the provided online portal or by mail, with specific guidelines on how to categorize confidential information if needed. Comments are due by May 23, 2025.
Abstract
The Secretary of Transportation, as represented by the Maritime Administration (MARAD), is authorized to make determinations regarding the coastwise use of foreign built; certain U.S. built; and U.S. and foreign rebuilt vessels that solely carry no more than twelve passengers for hire. MARAD has received such a determination request and is publishing this notice to solicit comments to assist with determining whether the proposed use of the vessel set forth in the request would have an adverse effect on U.S. vessel builders or U.S. coastwise trade businesses that use U.S.-built vessels in those businesses. Information about the requestor's vessel, including a description of the proposed service, is in the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section below.
Keywords AI
Sources
AnalysisAI
The document from the Department of Transportation's Maritime Administration (MARAD) seeks public input on a proposal to use a foreign-built vessel, S/V Dragonfly, for carrying up to twelve passengers for hire in U.S. waters. The main concern centers around whether this might harm U.S. shipbuilders or businesses that rely on U.S.-built vessels. This editorial commentary explores the implications of the document, potential issues, and its impact on various stakeholders.
Summary of the Document
The Secretary of Transportation, via MARAD, is evaluating a request concerning the vessel S/V Dragonfly, constructed outside the U.S., to engage in coastwise trade in U.S. waters. To do this, MARAD needs public feedback regarding potential adverse effects on U.S. shipbuilders or companies using domestically built vessels. The document details how to submit comments and outlines the process for confidential submissions. Input is requested by May 23, 2025.
Significant Issues or Concerns
One key issue with the document is its lack of specific information about the vessel S/V Dragonfly and the exact nature of its proposed operations. Without this detail, assessing the potential impact on U.S. businesses is challenging. Additionally, the criteria MARAD uses to determine adverse effects are not explicitly defined, creating possible ambiguity.
The comment submission guidelines are quite complex, especially for those wanting to submit confidential information. This complexity could deter participation from those unfamiliar with the process. Moreover, the requirement to publish personal information with comments may discourage valuable contributions due to privacy concerns.
The document assumes readers are familiar with maritime laws and regulations, like 46 U.S.C. 12121(b) and 49 CFR 1.93(a), without offering clear explanations, which could confuse those not versed in legal jargon.
Impact on the Public
From a broad perspective, this document impacts public participation in maritime regulatory processes. Ensuring a fair opportunity for public input is crucial in maintaining a transparent system where citizens can voice their concerns about national trade policies.
Impact on Stakeholders
For U.S. shipbuilders and businesses engaged in coastwise trade with U.S.-built vessels, the potential approval of the S/V Dragonfly could represent increased competition. If this foreign-built vessel is allowed to operate, these entities might face economic consequences owing to shifts in market dynamics.
On the other hand, those supporting the use of the S/V Dragonfly could argue that it offers more options for consumers and could inspire innovation within the industry by encouraging domestic manufacturers to enhance their offerings to stay competitive.
Conclusion
This Federal Register notice by MARAD highlights critical regulatory processes concerning the use of foreign-built vessels in U.S. waters. While it seeks public input, several issues could hinder comprehensive participation. For stakeholders, the outcome could significantly influence economic conditions in the shipbuilding sector and the broader maritime industry. Balancing regulatory rigor with transparent and accessible public participation remains essential in this evaluative process.
Issues
• The document does not provide specific information on the requestor or the nature of the proposed use of the vessel S/V Dragonfly, making it difficult to assess the impact on U.S. vessel builders or coastwise trade businesses.
• There is no detailed information regarding the criteria used by MARAD to determine whether the use of the vessel will have an adverse effect on U.S. businesses, which could lead to ambiguity in the decision-making process.
• The public comment guidelines are complex, with specific instructions for submitting confidential comments, which may discourage participation from individuals unfamiliar with the process.
• The requirement to publish personal information along with comments may deter some individuals from providing valuable input due to privacy concerns.
• The document assumes familiarity with several laws and regulations (e.g., 46 U.S.C. 12121(b), 49 CFR 1.93(a)) without providing an explanation or summary, which may be confusing for readers not well-versed in maritime law.