Overview
Title
Combined Notice of Filings
Agencies
ELI5 AI
The Energy Department and a team called the "Federal Energy Regulatory Commission" got some papers about how much it costs to use a gas pipe, and a company wants to change the price. People can say what they think about this change, but they need to do it before a deadline.
Summary AI
The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) has received several filings related to natural gas pipeline rates and refunds. These include a rate approval request from Pecan Pipeline Company and an amendment to a negotiated rate agreement by Natural Gas Pipeline Company of America LLC. Both the public and interested parties can intervene, protest, or comment on these filings by specified deadlines. More information about the proceedings and filing requirements is accessible online, and the Office of Public Participation is available to assist those seeking to engage in the process.
Keywords AI
Sources
AnalysisAI
The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) has issued a notice regarding several filings related to natural gas pipeline rates and refunds. This document highlights two primary proceedings: a rate approval request by Pecan Pipeline Company and an amendment to a negotiated rate agreement by Natural Gas Pipeline Company of America LLC. Additionally, there is a compliance filing by Maritimes & Northeast Pipeline, L.L.C. concerning an existing proceeding. The document outlines the procedures for public and interested parties to intervene or comment on these matters, along with the relevant deadlines.
Summary of the Notice
The notice serves to inform the public and stakeholders about recent filings received by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission concerning natural gas pipelines. Specifically, the filings involve requests for rate adjustments and amendments to existing agreements, indicating ongoing regulatory activities concerning energy infrastructure.
Significant Issues and Concerns
One of the primary concerns with this notice is the technical and legal language employed, which may not be easily understood by those unfamiliar with FERC's procedures and regulatory terms. Terms like "intervention," "comment date," and "docket numbers" may be unfamiliar to the general public, creating a barrier to engagement.
Furthermore, the document does not provide an abstract or a clear explanation of the purpose of each filing. This omission makes it difficult for the public to grasp why these rate changes or amendments are necessary, or what impact they could have.
There is also a lack of discussion regarding the financial implications of these rate filings, which raises questions about whether the changes will result in cost reductions or increases for consumers.
Impact on the Public
The impact of this document on the public primarily hinges on the outcomes of the proposed rate changes. If the rate filings lead to increased costs for natural gas, consumers could face higher utility bills. Conversely, if they result in cost efficiencies or improved service, the public could benefit. However, without a clear explanation or analysis of the proposed changes' impacts, it is challenging for the average person to understand the potential consequences.
Impact on Specific Stakeholders
For stakeholders such as landowners, community organizations, and industry participants, this notice indicates an opportunity to influence regulatory outcomes through intervention or protest. However, given the technical nature of the document, stakeholders without a background in regulatory affairs may find navigating the process daunting.
The document does provide contact information for the Office of Public Participation (OPP), which encourages public engagement and serves as a resource for those unfamiliar with FERC processes. This could potentially empower more stakeholders to participate, provided they receive timely and effective support.
Overall, while the notice seems designed to foster transparency and public participation in regulatory activities, the complexity of the language used and the lack of detailed explanations may limit its effectiveness in achieving informed public engagement.
Issues
• The document does not provide an abstract, making it less clear what the overall purpose of the notice is.
• The language used in the document is technical and may not be easily understandable to individuals unfamiliar with regulatory and legal terms, particularly regarding intervention and filing procedures.
• There is no information about the financial implications or budget involved in these proceedings, which makes it difficult to assess the potential for wasteful or favorable spending.
• The purpose or necessity of each rate filing is not clearly explained, potentially making it difficult for the public to understand the need or impact of these changes.
• Contact information is provided for public inquiries, but there is no assurance that responses will be timely or helpful, possibly hindering public engagement.