FR 2025-06935

The document provides a notice from the Transportation Security Administration (TSA) inviting public comments on an Information Collection Request (ICR). This request is related to the Law Enforcement Officers Safety Act (LEOSA) and the issuance of retired badges and credentials. The TSA intends to extend this collection request and is seeking feedback from the public on its current practices. The collection collects information from current and former TSA employees who wish to obtain LEOSA ID cards, retired badges, or retired credentials. This initiative enables qualified retired law enforcement officers to carry concealed firearms across the U.S. under certain conditions. The TSA is mandating that retired badges and credentials clearly indicate any limitations of authority, ensuring clarity in their use. Public comments for this request can be submitted until June 23, 2025.

Significant Issues and Concerns

Several issues arise from this document that may concern the general public:

1. Complex Legal and Administrative Language: The document is filled with complex legal references and administrative language, which may be difficult for a layperson to understand without additional explanation or context. Simplified language could make the information more accessible.

2. Lack of Cost Transparency: There is no detailed breakdown of costs associated with processing and reviewing applications for LEOSA ID Cards and retired badges/credentials. Insight into these costs could help identify any potential for wasteful spending.

3. Efficiency of Time Estimates: The document does not explain why certain processes, like preparing a request to review a rejected application, are estimated to take as long as they do. There may be opportunities for efficiency improvements if these processes are examined more closely.

4. Use of Technology: The document makes no mention of potential technological solutions that might minimize the burden of information collection, which could otherwise improve the efficiency of the application process.

5. Data Protection and Privacy Concerns: The summary lacks detail on how the collected data will be protected and what the privacy implications are for respondents. Given the personal nature of the information being collected, assurances on data protection could be crucial to encourage participation.

Impact on the Public

Broadly, this document could have implications for TSA employees and retirees who are interested in retaining some level of law enforcement identification and authority. The ability to carry concealed firearms nationwide comes with responsibilities and legal limitations which need to be understood by those affected.

Impact on Specific Stakeholders

For current and former TSA employees, particularly those eligible for LEOSA identification, the document represents an opportunity to comment on how these processes could be improved. However, the burdens associated with application processes, both in terms of time and the complexity of the required information, could seem daunting. Furthermore, stakeholders may feel reassured if there was more transparency about data protection practices.

In conclusion, while the TSA's initiative to seek public input is positive, more clarity and transparency on various fronts could enhance understanding and trust among the public and specific stakeholders. Improvements in the document’s clarity, cost breakdown, process efficiency, technological integration, and privacy protections would greatly benefit those involved.