FR 2025-06897

Northwest Pipeline LLC has filed an application with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) concerning its Kemmerer Horsepower Replacement Project in Lincoln County, Wyoming. This initiative is part of an extensive modernization effort aimed at improving the efficiency and environmental impact of its compressor units. Specifically, the project proposes the replacement of existing outdated compressor units with a newer, more efficient gas turbine model, which is expected to significantly reduce emissions. While this aims to enhance operational capacity without impairing energy delivery or service responsibilities, there are important considerations for the public and specific stakeholders.

Summary of the Document

The notice pertains to an application submitted to FERC seeking approval for a replacement project involving compressor units in Wyoming. The project consists of replacing four legacy compressors with a modern turbine-driven unit, anticipated to reduce emission outputs considerably. Northwest's broader Modernization and Emissions Reduction Program targets an overall decrease in nitrogen oxide and methane emissions. The public is invited to participate in the process by submitting comments, protesting, or filing motions to intervene in the proceeding, with a deadline of May 7, 2025, established for such submissions.

Significant Issues and Concerns

There are several notable issues within the document:

• Cost Estimation Transparency: The project estimates a total cost of over $73 million, yet the document lacks a detailed breakdown of how this figure is derived. This absence of clarity might obscure the understanding for stakeholders regarding how funds will be allocated and utilized.

• Complex Regulatory References: The instructions for participating in the review process are laden with regulatory citations that may be perplexing to individuals unfamiliar with legal jargon. These include specific Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) sections that are not explained in layman's terms.

• Public Engagement and Accessibility: While public participation is encouraged, the complexity of the procedural instructions and the need for docket numbers may discourage involvement. The encouragement of electronic filings balanced against the allowance for paper submissions could introduce inconsistencies in submission processing.

Broad Public Impact

The project is broadly poised to impact the public by potentially reducing environmental pollution and promoting energy efficiency. This aligns with wider societal goals of reducing greenhouse gas emissions and modernizing energy infrastructure. However, encountering hurdles in the engagement process could marginalize public involvement, especially those not well-versed in administrative or legal procedures.

Impact on Specific Stakeholders

• Environmental and Community Groups: These stakeholders are likely to view emission reductions positively, as they align with environmental conservation goals. Active participation in the review process allows these groups to voice support or concerns regarding the project's environmental assessments.

• Energy Consumers: Although the project is not expected to affect service delivery, consumers have a vested interest in how the cost of the project might ultimately influence rates or fees.

• Landowners and Local Residents: Individuals residing near the project area might have specific concerns regarding construction impacts, noise, and any potential hazard risks during the project's execution.

In conclusion, while the project heralds encouraging steps towards environmental stewardship within the energy sector, the pathway for public involvement and clarity on procedural participation remains an area ripe for refinement. Simplifying language, providing clearer guidance on the filing process, and offering more transparency on financial and environmental impacts could foster better public engagement and address stakeholder concerns comprehensively.

The document outlines a proposal by Northwest Pipeline LLC for the Kemmerer Horsepower Replacement Project in Wyoming. This project involves replacing aging compressor units at the Kemmerer Compressor Station as part of Northwest's broader Modernization and Emissions Reduction (MER) Program.

Summary of Financial Allocations

The primary financial reference in the document states that Northwest estimates the total cost of the Project to be $73,018,593. This expenditure reflects the costs associated with abandoning existing compressor units and installing a new turbine-driven unit with updated technology. Despite this substantial figure, the document lacks a detailed breakdown of how each component of the project contributes to the overall cost.

Financial Mention in Context of Identified Issues

1. Lack of Cost Breakdown: One of the key issues highlighted is the absence of a detailed cost breakdown. The total project cost of $73,018,593 is significant, but readers are not provided with insights on specific expenses associated with different project aspects, such as equipment, labor, or environmental impact assessments. This lack of transparency makes it difficult for stakeholders, including the public and regulatory bodies, to fully understand how resources are allocated.

2. Connection to MER Program: The project is part of Northwest's Modernization and Emissions Reduction (MER) Program, which aims to replace older compressors and reduce emissions. While the program supports beneficial environmental goals, the document does not include financial tracking or progress measurement over its six-year period. As the program involves long-term financial commitments, clear indicators of financial efficiency and progress are important.

3. Complexity of Procedural Language: Although this is not directly linked to financial allocations, the document uses complex regulatory references that may obscure understanding of the financial implications for a general audience. Simplifying the language and providing context, such as by explaining the significance of the docket number, could aid public understanding of how the project's finances are managed and monitored.

4. Electronic vs. Paper Submission: The document's emphasis on electronic submissions, while allowing for paper submissions, introduces potential inconsistencies. Financial data and related documentation may face processing delays depending on the submission method, impacting overall project transparency and timely public engagement.

The financial references in the document underscore a significant investment by Northwest Pipeline in modern infrastructure. However, the absence of detailed fiscal data and complexity in procedural communication present challenges to comprehending and scrutinizing these financial commitments effectively.