Overview
Title
Public Land Order No. 7963; National Defense Operating Area Withdrawal, Dona Ana, Luna, and Hidalgo Counties, NM
Agencies
ELI5 AI
The government has set aside a big piece of land in New Mexico for three years so the Army can use it to help keep the area near the border safe. This means no one else can use the land to build, mine, or drill there for now.
Summary AI
The Interior Department has issued a public land order that withdraws around 109,651 acres of federal land in Dona Ana, Luna, and Hidalgo Counties, New Mexico, from settlement, sale, mining, and leasing for three years. This land will be used by the Department of the Army for border security purposes, and the administrative responsibility for these lands will also shift to them. The affected lands lie along the U.S.-Mexico border, near the 60-foot-wide strip known as the "Roosevelt Reservation." The withdrawal is an emergency response to preserve values that might otherwise be lost.
Abstract
This Order withdraws, subject to valid existing rights, approximately 109,651 acres of Federal lands from settlement, sale, location, and entry under the general land laws, including the United States mining laws, mineral leasing laws, and geothermal leasing laws, for a period of 3 years for use by the Department of the Army for border security purposes. This withdrawal also transfers administrative jurisdiction of the lands to the Department of the Army.
Keywords AI
Sources
AnalysisAI
The recent publication by the Interior Department outlines a Public Land Order (PLO) affecting approximately 109,651 acres of federal land across Dona Ana, Luna, and Hidalgo Counties, New Mexico. This order withdraws the specified land from settlement, sale, and various types of resource extraction for a period of three years. It is designated for use by the Department of the Army in efforts related to border security. Additionally, this action transfers administrative responsibility from one federal agency to another.
General Summary of the Document
The main purpose of this public land order is to support border security by making it clear that certain federal lands will not be available for sale or other uses that might interfere with security operations. The land in question is located along the United States' border with Mexico, adjacent to what is known as the "Roosevelt Reservation." The purpose of the withdrawal is to mitigate emergency situations that could lead to the loss of particular values.
Significant Issues or Concerns
One primary issue arises from the highly technical nature of the document, particularly the legal descriptions using the township and range system. These descriptions can be difficult to understand for most of the general public, which might create barriers to public knowledge and civic engagement.
Furthermore, the document provides limited transparency regarding the specifics of how these lands will be utilized for border security. While it denotes an emergency situation, it doesn’t clarify what specific actions or "extraordinary measures" are planned, nor does it specify which values are at risk.
The reference to historical legal statutes, such as the Presidential Proclamation of May 27, 1907, might be unclear for those who are not familiar with those laws and their implications. This could leave many readers without the necessary context to fully understand the document’s legal framework.
Finally, while the expiration date of the withdrawal is mentioned, there is no indication of what criteria might lead to the extension of this order. The lack of clarity around future evaluations or plans could raise questions about long-term intentions.
Impact on the Public
Broadly, this order impacts the public by potentially altering land use policies that could affect local economies, especially those tied to natural resource extraction. Residents or stakeholders in these New Mexico counties might experience reduced opportunities for resource development or land sales during the withdrawal period.
Impact on Specific Stakeholders
For Local Economies and Residents: Resource development in the affected counties may be limited, affecting industries reliant on mining, mineral leasing, or similar activities. Residents who might have planned on land use or development within these areas could be directly impacted by these restrictions.
For Environmental and Conservation Groups: Organizations focused on environmental protection might view this withdrawal positively if it helps preserve natural landscapes from potentially disruptive development.
For the Department of the Army: The transfer of administrative control potentially expedites their operational capacity in managing border security efforts, potentially leading to more efficient implementation of related measures.
Overall, while the order's intent is clear in its fundamental action, the lack of detailed transparency regarding implementation and long-term implications poses several questions for public understanding and participation.
Issues
• The document contains highly technical language that may be complex for the general public to understand, particularly the legal descriptions of land locations using the township and range system.
• The purpose and justification of the land withdrawal for 'border security purposes' is not thoroughly explained, which might raise concerns about transparency and the necessity of the action.
• The document references many legal statutes and proclamations (e.g., the Presidential Proclamation of May 27, 1907) without providing context or explanation, which could be unclear to readers unfamiliar with these documents.
• The document does not specify what 'extraordinary measures' will be taken or what values need to be preserved, which may lead to ambiguity regarding the department's intentions or actions.
• The effective date and expiration of the land withdrawal are stated, but there is no mention of any potential plans or evaluations to determine if the withdrawal should be extended past three years.