FR 2025-06788

The document in question is a notice from the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) regarding several filings related to natural gas pipeline rates and reports. As is common with regulatory notices, this document communicates the receipt of specific filings, provides information on how interested parties can comment, and outlines the deadlines for participation.

General Summary

The notice communicates three main filings received by the Commission. First, Enterprise Texas Pipeline LLC has submitted a petition for rate approval, which intends to take effect on April 1, 2025. Second, East Cheyenne Gas Storage, LLC has filed an annual report detailing its purchases and sales, and third, there is a rate case update submitted by Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Company, LLC. The document emphasizes the deadlines for comments and participation in the proceedings, encouraging interested parties to engage either through submission of comments or formal intervention.

Significant Issues and Concerns

The document contains several notable issues. One significant concern is the absence of an abstract that can quickly guide the reader on the contents and purpose of the filings. Additionally, while the document cites regulations like 18 CFR 385.211, 385.214, and 385.206, it does not elaborate on their specifics, which might leave readers unfamiliar with regulatory language at a loss. Furthermore, the use of technical jargon, such as docket numbers and accession numbers, without elaboration may limit accessibility to a broader audience.

Moreover, the document lacks details on the financial implications of these filings, which could otherwise provide stakeholders and the public with insight into potential economic impacts or benefits. The outcome or decisions related to these filings are also not mentioned, leaving a degree of uncertainty about how stakeholders might be affected.

Public Impact

For the general public, this notice demonstrates FERC's ongoing role in overseeing energy regulations, which indirectly affects energy prices and services. However, the lack of detailed implications and outcomes may challenge public understanding of how these filings specifically influence consumer costs or service reliability.

Impact on Stakeholders

From a stakeholder perspective, this document is pivotal. Entities like energy companies, industry stakeholders, and consumer advocacy groups will need to follow these proceedings closely to understand the potential shifts in regulatory stances, rate adjustments, and compliance obligations. On the positive side, the document outlines clear methods for participation through comments or interventions, enabling stakeholders to have a say in the process.

Conversely, the complexity of the regulatory language and absence of detailed financial impact assessments might hinder some stakeholders, particularly smaller entities or laypersons, from effectively participating or understanding the implications for their interests. This could influence their capacity to advocate for conditions that reflect their needs or concerns.

In conclusion, while the document communicates essential regulatory information, its effectiveness as a communication tool could be improved by providing more context, explanation, and clarity about the impacts and outcomes of the filings.