FR 2025-06739

Overview

Title

Federal and State Current Issues Collaborative; Notice of Meeting and Agenda

Agencies

ELI5 AI

The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission is having a meeting to talk about how energy from gas and electricity goes together and where gas is stored. People can go to the meeting in person or watch it online for free.

Summary AI

The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission will hold the second public meeting of the Federal and State Current Issues Collaborative on April 30, 2025. The meeting will take place from 9 a.m. to 1 p.m. EDT in Washington, DC, and will focus on discussing general issues around gas-electric coordination and gas storage. No specific proceedings will be addressed during this meeting. The event is open to the public, and those interested can attend either in person or via webcast without needing to register or pay.

Type: Notice
Citation: 90 FR 16522
Document #: 2025-06739
Date:
Volume: 90
Pages: 16522-16522

AnalysisAI

The document from the Federal Register announces an upcoming public meeting of the Federal and State Current Issues Collaborative, organized by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC). This event is set for April 30, 2025, in Washington, DC. The gathering will focus on general discussions related to gas-electric coordination and gas storage. Public participation is encouraged, with no associated fees or registration requirements, and options to attend either in person or online.

General Summary

This notice informs the public about the specifics of a meeting aimed at discussing broad issues concerning gas-electric coordination and gas storage. It also provides logistical details about the meeting's timing, location, and accessibility. Although the document outlines the meeting's intended subject matter, it stops short of specifying any distinct agendas or outcomes related to the topics.

Significant Issues or Concerns

Despite its informative nature, the document raises several concerns. Firstly, it lacks concrete objectives or expected outcomes, making it difficult for the public to understand the meeting's significance or potential impact on gas-electric coordination and gas storage policies. This ambiguity might hinder effective stakeholder engagement.

Moreover, the document does not address potential costs associated with hosting the meeting or the expense of transcription services, which could raise transparency issues regarding financial expenditures. Additionally, there is no context provided about the Collaborative's formation or the specific problems it aims to tackle within the broader themes of gas-electric coordination and gas storage.

The description of accessibility accommodations is rather generic, failing to outline the specific types of support available. This opacity might limit individuals with disabilities from attending or participating effectively.

Lastly, the document does not elaborate on how public feedback will be gathered and utilized, potentially undermining public engagement and trust in the Collaborative's processes and decisions.

Potential Public Impact

For the general public, this meeting serves as an opportunity to observe federal and state discussions on crucial energy issues. However, due to the lack of specific agendas or objectives, its direct impact on public understanding or policy development remains uncertain. Individuals interested in energy policy may find the discussions informative, yet they may also feel detached due to the absence of mechanisms for public input.

Impact on Specific Stakeholders

Certain stakeholders, particularly those in the energy sector or involved in regulatory processes, might find the meeting beneficial as it offers insights into federal and state perspectives on coordination and storage issues. Nevertheless, without clear objectives or actionable outcomes, these stakeholders might question the relevance or utility of the Collaborative's discussions.

For individuals with disabilities, unclear accessibility provisions could pose participation challenges, highlighting a need for better communication regarding available accommodations.

In summary, while the meeting is accessible and open to the public, the lack of detailed agendas and clear public engagement processes may limit its effectiveness and perceived importance among stakeholders and the general public. Addressing these concerns could enhance transparency, inclusivity, and the overall impact of the Federal and State Current Issues Collaborative's efforts.

Issues

  • • The document does not provide specific details on the expected outcomes or objectives of the meeting regarding gas-electric coordination and gas storage, which could lead to unclear understanding of the meeting's importance or impact.

  • • The document does not specify any potential costs associated with the event, such as the expenses of hosting the meeting or the transcription service, which may pose concerns regarding transparency of spending.

  • • The document lacks information on why the collaborative was formed or what specific issues within gas-electric coordination and gas storage are to be addressed, leading to potential ambiguity about its relevance and necessity.

  • • The language regarding accessibility accommodations could be clearer by detailing examples of accommodations available to attendees, which would enhance understanding and inclusivity.

  • • There is no mention of how feedback or participation from the public (other than listening or observing) will be integrated into the Collaborative's efforts or outcomes, potentially limiting public engagement or transparency.

Statistics

Size

Pages: 1
Words: 444
Sentences: 22
Entities: 42

Language

Nouns: 116
Verbs: 27
Adjectives: 14
Adverbs: 7
Numbers: 47

Complexity

Average Token Length:
5.29
Average Sentence Length:
20.18
Token Entropy:
4.88
Readability (ARI):
16.63

Reading Time

about a minute or two