FR 2025-06632

Overview

Title

Notice of Inventory Completion: University of Wisconsin Milwaukee, Milwaukee, WI

Agencies

ELI5 AI

The University of Wisconsin Milwaukee found some ancient Native American bones and things buried with them a long time ago. They figured out which tribes the bones belong to and are planning to give them back to those tribes soon.

Summary AI

The University of Wisconsin Milwaukee (UWM) completed an inventory under the Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act (NAGPRA), identifying the remains of 31 Native American individuals and 18 associated funerary objects from the Pipe Site Complex in Wisconsin. The remains and objects have been culturally affiliated with several tribes, including the Ho-Chunk Nation of Wisconsin and others. Repatriation may start on or after May 19, 2025, with eligible Indian Tribes or Native Hawaiian organizations able to request the return of these remains and objects. If multiple requests are made, UWM will determine the most appropriate requestor following NAGPRA guidelines.

Abstract

In accordance with the Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act (NAGPRA), the University of Wisconsin Milwaukee (UWM) has completed an inventory of human remains and associated funerary objects and has determined that there is a cultural affiliation between the human remains and associated funerary objects and Indian Tribes or Native Hawaiian organizations in this notice.

Type: Notice
Citation: 90 FR 16532
Document #: 2025-06632
Date:
Volume: 90
Pages: 16532-16532

AnalysisAI

The document from the Federal Register outlines a notice in compliance with the Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act (NAGPRA) issued by the University of Wisconsin Milwaukee (UWM). It details the completion of an inventory involving the human remains of 31 Native American individuals and 18 associated funerary objects. These artifacts originated from the Pipe Site Complex in Wisconsin. As a result, UWM has identified cultural connections between these items and various Indian Tribes, such as the Ho-Chunk Nation of Wisconsin, which are eligible to request their repatriation starting May 19, 2025.

General Summary

The notice serves a dual purpose: to inform the public and relevant stakeholders about the findings of UWM's inventory and to initiate the process for repatriation of the remains and objects under NAGPRA. It contains detailed information on the archaeological findings at the Pipe Site Complex and acknowledges the cultural affiliations with specific tribes. This action follows a legal framework aimed at ensuring respectful treatment and rightful return of ancestral remains and objects to descendant communities.

Significant Issues or Concerns

There are a few notable issues within the document. Firstly, an inconsistency exists in the reference to the responsible institution for handling repatriation requests. The document mentions both UWM (University of Wisconsin Milwaukee) and UWO, which could confuse stakeholders about who to contact or interact with for repatriation.

Additionally, the phrase "reasonably believed to have been placed intentionally" regarding the funerary objects could be misinterpreted. A more precise description might help clarify the intentionality behind the placement of these objects, avoiding ambiguity.

Moreover, the document includes legal references such as "25 U.S.C. 3003" and "43 CFR 10.10," which might be unfamiliar to a general audience. Providing additional context or simplifying these references could enhance understanding.

The detailed descriptions of the funerary objects may overwhelm individuals not versed in archaeology or anthropology, suggesting a potential need for simplification or explanation of these terms.

Finally, the contact information is formatted with odd spacing and indentation, which could detract from readability and clarity.

Impact on the Public

For the general public, this notice underscores the commitments to respect Native American cultural heritage under NAGPRA. It highlights ongoing efforts to rectify past injustices where indigenous burial sites were disturbed, underscoring ethical considerations in archaeology.

Impact on Specific Stakeholders

For Native American Tribes, this notice represents a significant and positive development. It provides a pathway for reclaiming ancestors' remains and culturally significant objects, contributing to cultural preservation and reconciliation. However, if there are competing claims for repatriation, challenges may arise in determining eligibility and appropriateness—UWM will have the task of managing such disputes in line with NAGPRA directives.

In conclusion, this document, while complex, facilitates an essential dialogue between academic institutions and indigenous communities, fostering respect and understanding. However, clarification and simplification in certain areas could improve its accessibility and efficacy.

Issues

  • • The document references UWM (University of Wisconsin Milwaukee) but also mentions UWO in the section about repatriation requests. This inconsistency could create confusion about which institution is responsible for determining the most appropriate requestor for repatriation.

  • • The phrase 'reasonably believed to have been placed intentionally' in the determinations could be more precise to avoid ambiguity regarding the intentionality of the placement of funerary objects.

  • • Some readers might find the legal references and citations, such as '25 U.S.C. 3003' and '43 CFR 10.10', difficult to understand without additional context or explanation.

  • • The notice contains detailed descriptions of the funerary objects, which might be overly complex for a general audience not well-versed in archaeology or anthropology. Consideration of audience and simplification could be beneficial.

  • • The contact information is formatted inconsistently, with extended spacing and indentation, which might affect readability.

Statistics

Size

Pages: 1
Words: 855
Sentences: 29
Entities: 83

Language

Nouns: 280
Verbs: 60
Adjectives: 67
Adverbs: 8
Numbers: 44

Complexity

Average Token Length:
4.81
Average Sentence Length:
29.48
Token Entropy:
4.99
Readability (ARI):
19.56

Reading Time

about 3 minutes