FR 2025-06622

Overview

Title

Fisheries of the Exclusive Economic Zone Off Alaska; Pacific Cod by Vessels Using Jig Gear in the Central Regulatory Area of the Gulf of Alaska

Agencies

ELI5 AI

In April 2025, the government decided that fishers can't catch a type of fish called Pacific cod using a special kind of fishing tool in a part of Alaska's ocean for a little while. This is to make sure there are enough fish left in the ocean.

Summary AI

The National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), part of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), has temporarily banned fishing for Pacific cod with jig gear in a specific area of the Gulf of Alaska. This decision aims to ensure that the amount of fish caught does not exceed the allowed limit for the A season of 2025. The restriction is active from April 14, 2025, to June 10, 2025, and is based on regulations established to protect fish populations. The agency expedited the rule's implementation due to urgent, recent data indicating the catch limit was nearly reached.

Abstract

NMFS is prohibiting directed fishing for Pacific cod by vessels using jig gear in the Central Regulatory Area of the Gulf of Alaska (GOA). This action is necessary to prevent exceeding the A season allowance of the 2025 total allowable catch (TAC) of Pacific cod by vessels using jig gear in the Central Regulatory Area of the GOA.

Type: Rule
Citation: 90 FR 16092
Document #: 2025-06622
Date:
Volume: 90
Pages: 16092-16092

AnalysisAI

The document from the Federal Register outlines a temporary restriction imposed by the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), a part of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA). This regulation prohibits fishing for Pacific cod using jig gear in the Central Regulatory Area of the Gulf of Alaska. The ban is in effect from April 14, 2025, through June 10, 2025, with the primary goal of preventing the fishing season's quota from being exceeded.

Summary of the Document

This rule is a proactive measure intended to protect Pacific cod populations by ensuring that the catch limits, known as the Total Allowable Catch (TAC), are not surpassed during the A season of 2025. Such regulations are part of broader efforts to manage fish stocks sustainably, reflecting the government's commitment to fishery conservation as per the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act.

Significant Issues and Concerns

While the action taken by NMFS supports sustainable fisheries management, several concerns arise from the manner in which this decision was implemented. Firstly, the rule lacks specific detail on its economic impact. This omission makes it challenging to gauge how significantly the prohibition will affect fishermen who rely on Pacific cod caught through jigging.

Additionally, the document mentions that the rule was enacted without prior notice or opportunity for public comment due to recent data indicating an impending catch limit breach. However, it does not provide a comprehensive justification beyond the data's late availability. This could be perceived as insufficient transparency in the decision-making process. Moreover, the absence of mitigation strategies for affected fishermen may lead to concerns about how their livelihoods will be addressed during the closure.

The legal language used in the document is technical and may be difficult for those outside the regulatory sphere to fully comprehend. This complexity might impede fishermen and the general public from understanding the implications of the regulation thoroughly.

Impact on the Public and Stakeholders

Broad Public Impact:

For the general public, the rule demonstrates proactive resource management, highlighting NOAA’s dedication to environmental stewardship. Maintaining fish populations at sustainable levels is crucial for environmental balance and future economic opportunities, contributing to an understanding that such measures, while restrictive, support long-term conservation goals.

Impact on Specific Stakeholders:

Fishermen using jig gear in the affected area of the Gulf of Alaska face negative impacts as their ability to catch Pacific cod is restricted during the closure period. This could lead to economic hardship for those dependent on this seasonal catch. The rule presents significant disruptions without an articulated plan for compensatory support or alternative employment options.

Conversely, conservation organizations and advocates for sustainable fishing may view this restriction positively. It represents a decisive action to prevent overfishing, which is essential for preserving marine biodiversity and ensuring the viability of fish stocks for future generations.

Conclusion

The NMFS's temporary restriction on Pacific cod fishing in the Gulf of Alaska is centered on sustainable practices. Nonetheless, the execution of the rule raises concerns due to the lack of economic impact analysis, limited transparency in decision-making, and the absence of mitigation strategies for affected stakeholders. Balancing environmental conservation with the livelihoods of those in the fishing industry remains a critical challenge that requires further consideration.

Issues

  • • The document does not provide specific information on the economic impact of prohibiting directed fishing for Pacific cod with jig gear, which could be useful for assessing potential economic consequences for affected fishermen.

  • • The document mentions that there is good cause to waive prior notice and opportunity for public comment, but it does not provide detailed justification as to why this is necessary beyond stating that the most recent data became available on April 9, 2025. This could be seen as lacking transparency.

  • • There is no mention of any mitigation measures or support for those affected by the sudden closure, which could raise concerns about how the interests of impacted fishermen are being addressed.

  • • The legal references and citations (e.g., 50 CFR part 679, § 679.20(d)(1)(i)) might be overly complex for individuals unfamiliar with regulatory language, potentially hindering a full understanding of the rules and their implications.

  • • The language used in citing legal authorities and the procedural steps taken under the Magnuson-Stevens Act might be considered complex, particularly for individuals not versed in federal fisheries management regulations.

Statistics

Size

Pages: 1
Words: 742
Sentences: 24
Entities: 86

Language

Nouns: 261
Verbs: 51
Adjectives: 40
Adverbs: 8
Numbers: 47

Complexity

Average Token Length:
4.28
Average Sentence Length:
30.92
Token Entropy:
4.99
Readability (ARI):
17.77

Reading Time

about 2 minutes