Overview
Title
Proposed Collection; Comment Request for Regulation Project
Agencies
ELI5 AI
The IRS wants to hear people's thoughts about some church rules to see if they make work too hard or slow. They want ideas by June 16, 2025, to help decide if these rules need changing, even though only a few people are affected.
Summary AI
The Internal Revenue Service (IRS) is requesting public comments on certain information collections related to church plan clarifications under section 336 of the PATH Act. The IRS aims to reduce paperwork and the burden on respondents as part of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995. Interested parties should submit their comments by June 16, 2025. This request involves reporting requirements linked to the revocation of elections by church-related organizations to be treated as a single employer.
Abstract
The Internal Revenue Service, as part of its continuing effort to reduce paperwork and respondent burden, invites the general public and other Federal agencies to take this opportunity to comment on continuing information collections, as required by the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995. The IRS is soliciting comments concerning reporting requirements for notice regarding certain church plan clarifications under section 336 of the PATH Act.
Keywords AI
Sources
AnalysisAI
The Federal Register document is a notice and request for comments from the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) concerning information collections connected to church plan clarifications under section 336 of the PATH Act. This initiative is in line with the IRS's ongoing efforts to reduce paperwork and the burden on respondents as part of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995. The public and other federal agencies are invited to contribute their views by June 16, 2025. The document focuses on reporting requirements relating to the revocation of certain elections by church-related entities to be recognized as a single employer.
General Summary
The notice invites public input on paperwork requirements impacting church-related organizations under specific provisions of tax law. It implies that these organizations may choose whether to be aggregated or treated independently for tax purposes, based on the provisions added under the PATH Act. The IRS is particularly interested in feedback about the necessity of the information collection, accuracy of burden estimates, and potential improvements in efficiency and clarity.
Significant Issues and Concerns
Several concerns arise from the document. Notably, the estimated number of respondents is quite minimal, with only three entities expected to submit documentation according to these requirements. This raises questions about whether the process is unnecessarily complex or inefficient for such a limited group. Additionally, there is a lack of transparency regarding why the decision was made not to alter the existing burden. Another concern is the complex legal language used, such as references to specific sections of tax law, which could present comprehension challenges for laypersons. Lastly, while the document solicits public comments, it does not clearly articulate how these will be utilized in decision-making, which might discourage participation.
Public Impact
The broader public may not be significantly impacted by this document directly, given its highly specialized focus. However, any amendments resulting from comments could influence the legislative framework that affects church-related organizations. Improved understanding and efficiency in these requirements may alleviate some administrative burdens on organizations.
Impact on Stakeholders
For church-related organizations, the document is of particular importance as it addresses their ability to be treated as single or separate entities for tax purposes. Changes in the paperwork and reporting requirements could have financial and operational implications for them. Conversely, maintaining the status quo could relieve these organizations of the need to adapt to new procedures, provided current methods are not unduly burdensome. Given the low number of respondents, these changes, or lack thereof, are likely to impact a small subset very directly, without widespread effects.
The commentary highlights the complexity and the intricacy of tax-related regulations and how they intersect with national legislation, suggesting a continuous balancing act between governmental transparency, efficiency, and clarity.
Issues
• The document mentions that the estimated number of respondents is 3, raising a concern about whether the process is overly complex or inefficient for such a small number of respondents.
• The document states that there are no changes to the paperwork burden previously approved, but does not clarify how this decision was reached, which might be considered lacking transparency.
• The complexity of the statutory references (e.g., section 414(c)(2)(C) and (D) and PATH Act) could be difficult for laypeople to understand, suggesting an opportunity to simplify or clarify this language.
• The request for comments section does not provide a clear explanation of how submitted comments will be utilized to influence the review process, which may deter public participation.