Overview
Title
Pertaining To Preventing Access to U.S. Sensitive Personal Data and Government-Related Data by Countries of Concern or Covered Persons
Agencies
ELI5 AI
The Department of Justice found a mistake in a rule about who can look at or buy certain important information. They fixed the mistake by changing a number, so the rule works better to keep everyone's information safe.
Summary AI
The Department of Justice's National Security Division issued a correction to a rule that limits certain data transactions with specific countries or individuals. Initially published on January 8, 2025, the rule contained an incorrect reference, which this document aims to fix. The correction involves changing a cross-reference in section 202.401 of the regulations to ensure accuracy. This amendment takes effect on April 18, 2025, and aims to support national security by accurately addressing access to sensitive data.
Abstract
On January 8, 2025, the Department of Justice published a final rule, prohibiting and restricting certain data transactions with certain countries or persons. That document incorrectly listed a cross- reference. This document corrects the final rule.
Keywords AI
Sources
AnalysisAI
The document in question is a corrective amendment issued by the Department of Justice's National Security Division, which was originally published on January 8, 2025. The purpose of the amendment is to address an error in a previously published rule concerning data transactions that involve certain countries or individuals deemed sensitive by the U.S. government.
General Summary
In essence, the amendment corrects a mistake pertaining to a cross-reference within the legal text of the rule. This rule is part of the regulatory framework aimed at preventing access to U.S. sensitive personal data and government-related data by entities from countries of concern or specific covered individuals. The need for this correction highlights the complexities involved in maintaining accurate and precise legal documentation, which is crucial for effective enforcement and compliance.
Significant Issues or Concerns
Technical Corrections: The primary issue addressed by this document is a technical one, involving the correction of a cross-reference within the regulatory framework. Such corrections are vital to ensure that legal documents serve their intended purpose and remain enforceable. In this case, the correction changes a reference from one section (§ 202.408) to another (§ 202.248), which might affect how the rules are applied.
Complex Legal Language: The document employs complex legal terminology typical of regulatory materials published in the Federal Register. While this language is suitable for its target audience, it might be challenging for the general public to comprehend without additional context or explanation regarding what these specific sections entail.
Access to Contact Information: Contact details for further inquiries are provided, primarily emphasizing email communication. For individuals without reliable internet access, this reliance on email could pose an accessibility barrier.
Impact on the Public
Broad Impact: For the general public, this correction may seem procedural with no apparent immediate impact. However, these rules fit within a larger umbrella of national security precautions intended to protect citizens' sensitive personal data against unauthorized access by potentially hostile entities.
Specific Stakeholders: The correction might have a more pronounced impact on legal practitioners, businesses, and those involved in technology and data privacy sectors. Accurate legal references are essential for these stakeholders to ensure compliance and avoid potential legal ramifications.
Positive and Negative Impacts
Positive Impact: The accuracy of legal documents is necessary for fair application and enforcement. Stakeholders relying on these documents will benefit from precise legal frameworks that minimize confusion and misinterpretation.
Negative Impact: Although the direct impact of this correction is limited, any delay or inaccuracy in legal documentation could potentially disrupt operations or cause uncertainties for those engaged in international data transactions, affecting business decisions and strategies.
Ultimately, while this document represents a routine procedural adjustment, it underscores the important role that precision in legal language and documentation plays in the functioning of policy and its implications for national security, as well as compliance on both national and international levels.
Issues
• The document includes technical amendments and corrections, primarily correcting a cross-reference mistake. It does not detail any financial aspects or direct spending, thus no apparent wasteful spending can be identified.
• The document does not specify any particular organizations or individuals that are favored, as it focuses on correcting legal references.
• The language in the document is legal and regulatory in nature. While it may be complex for general audiences, it is typical for documents published in the Federal Register and may be suitable for the target audience of legal and government professionals.
• The correction made to the cross-reference from §202.408 to §202.248 might be unclear for those unfamiliar with the implications of these sections, without a detailed explanation of what those sections entail.
• Contact details are specified clearly, but reliance on email could be a barrier for those without Internet access.