FR 2025-06243

The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) has issued a notice regarding accounting request filings submitted by LA Storage, LLC, and Gillis Hub Pipeline, LLC. These filings aim to seek approval for certain proposed journal entries linked to a Commission Order from June 2023. The public is invited to participate in the proceedings by submitting their comments, protests, or requests for intervention by April 25, 2025. The filings are accessible through FERC's online library.

Significant Issues and Concerns

The notice raises several noteworthy issues:

• Lack of Financial Details: The document does not provide a detailed description of the financial implications or the content of the proposed journal entries. This omission makes it challenging for stakeholders and the public to understand the potential financial impact and to evaluate whether there are concerns about misuse of funds or any bias toward the companies involved.

• Technical Language: The document employs technical jargon, such as "journal entries" and "Docket Numbers," which might not be easily comprehensible to a general audience. This poses a challenge for meaningful public engagement without additional explanations or context.

• Limited Information: Readers must refer to other documents and rules not included in the notice. This requirement can be burdensome, as individuals or organizations must invest extra effort to locate and review these references to fully understand the document's implications.

• Accessibility of Assistance: While the document provides contact information for assistance, it may not offer sufficient guidance for individuals new to the FERC’s processes. More comprehensive support could improve engagement and participation from the public.

Broad Public Impact

The notice by FERC facilitates transparency in proceedings involving significant infrastructure players like LA Storage, LLC, and Gillis Hub Pipeline, LLC. However, for the broader public, the opacity surrounding financial implications and technical terms could reduce trust and involvement. Effective public participation relies on clear, accessible information, which is currently limited in this notice.

Impact on Specific Stakeholders

For stakeholders directly involved, such as landowners, community groups, and industry competitors, the outcomes of these filings could have substantial repercussions. For instance, approval of the journal entries might affect competitive dynamics in the energy market or influence local infrastructure development.

Positive Impact

• Regulatory Insight: For industry professionals, the filings provide insight into regulatory practices and the Commission's decision-making processes, potentially guiding future applications or compliance strategies.

• Public Engagement Support: The Commission's Office of Public Participation offers a valuable resource, assisting various stakeholders in understanding and participating in these regulatory processes, which may enhance informed decision-making.

Negative Impact

• Potential Overlook of Public Concerns: Without detailed financial information or plain language explanations, the public might find it difficult to voice their concerns, potentially leading to outcomes that do not fully consider or prioritize community interests.

• Barriers to Participation: The requirement to navigate the eLibrary and additional documentation may deter those with limited time or resources from effectively engaging with the process, reducing the diversity of voices in these critical discussions.

In conclusion, while the notice serves as a formal announcement of proceedings, its effectiveness in fostering widespread public engagement and transparency is questionable due to the noted issues. Efforts to provide clearer, more comprehensive content could greatly enhance its influence and reach.