FR 2025-06111

Overview

Title

Establishment of Class E Airspace; Blanding Municipal Airport, Blanding, UT

Agencies

ELI5 AI

The FAA has made a change to the rules about how airplanes fly in the sky near Blanding Municipal Airport, Utah. They set new areas where planes can safely fly at certain heights, making it easier and safer for planes, especially when it's cloudy or dark.

Summary AI

The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) has issued a final rule that modifies the Class E airspace at Blanding Municipal Airport in Utah. This change establishes Class E airspace starting from 700 feet above the ground and removes Class E airspace from 1,200 feet above the ground to enhance the airport's instrument flight procedures. The rule also updates the airport's legal description and corrects previous language to accurately describe the airspace modification. The FAA determined this rule would not have significant environmental or economic impacts.

Abstract

This action modifies the Class E airspace at Blanding Municipal Airport, UT by establishing Class E airspace extending upward from 700 feet above the surface and removing Class E airspace extending from 1,200 feet above the surface at the airport. Additionally, this action makes administrative amendments to update the airport's legal description. These actions support the airport's instrument flight rules (IFR) operations by modifying transitional Class E airspace at the airport.

Type: Rule
Citation: 90 FR 15315
Document #: 2025-06111
Date:
Volume: 90
Pages: 15315-15316

AnalysisAI

The document, issued by the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), outlines a final rule that revises the Class E airspace designation at Blanding Municipal Airport in Utah. This airspace reconfiguration ensures improved instrument flight operations by establishing airspace from 700 feet above the airport and eliminating airspace from 1,200 feet above. Additionally, the document updates the airport's legal description to match current FAA standards. These changes come into effect on August 7, 2025, marking a notable shift in airspace management at Blanding Municipal Airport.

General Summary

The rule modifies existing airspace heights, specifically focusing on enhancing safety protocols for instrument flight operations at Blanding Municipal Airport. It describes the introduction of Class E airspace from 700 feet, while airspace extending from 1,200 feet above is removed to reduce redundancy with surrounding airspace managed by Denver's En Route Domestic Airspace. Administrative updates also refine the airport's legal geographical description, ensuring consistency with FAA databases. The FAA assures that these modifications will not significantly impact the environment or local economy and provide necessary updates to align with current aviation needs.

Significant Issues and Concerns

The document is replete with technical terms such as "Class E airspace" and "IFR operations," which might be unclear to those outside the aviation industry. The exclusionary language specifying airspace boundaries, such as "excluding that airspace beyond 3.1 miles west of and parallel to the runway," though adjusted for clarity, could still leave room for interpretation without correlating geographical markers or illustrative diagrams. The absence of public or stakeholder comments on the proposed rule may signify either minimal interest or ineffective outreach, raising questions about community engagement in such regulatory updates. Furthermore, while the FAA dismisses the potential for significant environmental impacts, the brief discussion in this regard might not ally public concerns about environmental safety fully.

Public Impact

For the general public, this document signifies a technical adjustment in aviation regulations that ensures safer, more efficient flight operations at a regional airport. By modifying airspace definitions, the FAA aims to streamline air traffic control measures, which could enhance the overall safety of air travel in the region. However, the document's technical nature might limit its accessibility to those unfamiliar with aviation regulations, potentially leading to a gap in public understanding and oversight.

Impact on Specific Stakeholders

For aviation professionals, including pilots and air traffic controllers, this rule provides clear guidelines that potentially enhance safety by reducing redundancies in airspace classifications. It might also lead to improved efficiency in handling instrument flight routes, benefiting carriers using Blanding Municipal Airport. Conversely, environmental advocacy groups might take issue with the limited environmental impact narrative, seeking more extensive assessments and documentation to ensure ecological safeguards. Local communities could perceive these changes positively if they result in improved safety or efficiency, though greater transparency and communication would likely bolster public trust.

Overall, while this document primarily affects aviation stakeholders directly, clear communication and engagement strategies are essential to facilitate broader public comprehension and oversight of such regulatory changes.

Issues

  • • The document uses technical aviation terminology like 'Class E airspace', 'IFR operations', 'FAA Order JO 7400.11', which may not be immediately understandable to those outside the aviation industry, potentially limiting general public understanding.

  • • The phrase 'excluding that airspace beyond 3.1 miles west of and parallel to the runway' could still be subject to different interpretations without clear geographical markers or diagrams, leading to ambiguity.

  • • The lack of received comments on the NPRM could suggest either a low level of public engagement or potential challenges in communication and outreach strategies to interested parties.

  • • The document is dense with regulatory references, which could be overwhelming and difficult to navigate for individuals not familiar with these documents or the regulatory framework.

  • • The document's environmental review section is brief and may not adequately address public concerns regarding potential environmental impacts, despite being categorized as a routine exclusion.

Statistics

Size

Pages: 2
Words: 1,554
Sentences: 51
Entities: 166

Language

Nouns: 549
Verbs: 112
Adjectives: 56
Adverbs: 36
Numbers: 119

Complexity

Average Token Length:
4.62
Average Sentence Length:
30.47
Token Entropy:
5.45
Readability (ARI):
19.15

Reading Time

about 5 minutes