Overview
Title
Notice of Application Tendered for Filing With the Commission and Soliciting Additional Study Requests and Establishing Procedural Schedule for Relicensing and a Deadline for Submission of Final Amendments; Stone Ridge Hydro, LLC
Agencies
ELI5 AI
Stone Ridge Hydro wants to fix and run an old power plant in New York, and people can give ideas or ask for more studies by May 20, 2025, but they might find the rules a bit confusing.
Summary AI
Stone Ridge Hydro, LLC has filed an application with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) for a new major license to rehabilitate and operate the Herkimer Hydroelectric Project located on West Canada Creek in New York. The project has been inactive since 2006 and some parts are in poor condition, but Stone Ridge plans to repair and run it in a similar way to the previous operation, generating 6,500-7,000 megawatt-hours annually. The public can inspect the application and participate in the review process by submitting requests for additional studies or by becoming a cooperating agency. The deadline for these filings is May 20, 2025, and final amendments to the application must be submitted within 30 days after the notice of readiness for environmental analysis.
Keywords AI
Sources
AnalysisAI
The Federal Register has published a notice concerning an application filed by Stone Ridge Hydro, LLC with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) for a new major license. This license pertains to the rehabilitation and operation of the Herkimer Hydroelectric Project, which is located on West Canada Creek in Herkimer County, New York. The project has been inactive since 2006, and Stone Ridge plans to repair and run it in a manner similar to its previous operations, with an estimated annual generation of 6,500 to 7,000 megawatt-hours.
General Overview
The document outlines the procedural steps and deadlines associated with the application process. It invites the public and relevant agencies to participate in the review, providing a deadline for requests for additional studies and for obtaining cooperating agency status by May 20, 2025. Moreover, it emphasizes that final amendments to the application must be submitted within 30 days after a notice indicating readiness for environmental analysis is issued.
Significant Issues
Several concerns arise from the document. A notable issue is the lack of detailed financial analysis or cost estimations related to the rehabilitation project, making it difficult for stakeholders to evaluate the economic soundness of the endeavor. Additionally, the notice does not elaborate on the selection process for Stone Ridge Hydro, LLC, which may raise queries regarding transparency and potential favoritism.
Moreover, while the document calls for cooperation and public involvement, the process for obtaining cooperating agency status lacks clear criteria, possibly creating ambiguity. The language used to describe filing procedures and contact points appears complex, which might hinder public participation, especially for individuals unfamiliar with regulatory terminology.
Additionally, the procedural schedule is vague, as it ties significant deadlines to the issuance of a future "notice of readiness" for environmental analysis without specific dates. This could complicate stakeholders' planning efforts.
Public Impact
The impact on the public depends largely on how well the processes encourage meaningful participation. If the language barriers and procedural ambiguities discourage public engagement, the process might not fully reflect community interests and concerns. On a positive note, if the project successfully revitalizes the hydroelectric facility, it could provide renewable energy and contribute to local economic development.
Stakeholder Impact
For energy consumers and environmental advocates, the project's successful rehabilitation could enhance local renewable energy production and provide ecological benefits. However, without explicit guidelines and transparent selection processes, there could be skepticism about the project's oversight and management.
Tribal and local communities who have interests in the project's environmental impacts may feel sidelined if engagement processes are unclear or difficult to navigate. This could potentially fuel dissatisfaction or distrust in the regulatory system.
In summary, while the document lays out a framework for a potentially beneficial project, addressing its weaknesses in financial transparency, process clarity, and public engagement could significantly enhance its credibility and effectiveness.
Issues
• The notice does not provide any detailed financial analysis or cost estimation for the rehabilitation project, which makes it difficult to assess potential wasteful spending.
• The document does not specify how the selection of Stone Ridge Hydro, LLC was made, raising questions about potential favoritism.
• There is no clear outline of the criteria for cooperating agency status, which could lead to ambiguity in the application process.
• The language around filing procedures and contact points is complex and might be difficult for the general public to fully understand, potentially limiting public participation.
• The procedural schedule and final amendments section lacks specific dates, relying solely on the notice of ready for environmental analysis issuance, which can be vague for planning purposes.
• The application is stated to be not ready for environmental analysis, yet no timeline or criteria are provided for when it will be ready, potentially delaying project progress.