Overview
Title
Establishment of Class E Airspace; Challis Airport, Challis, ID; Correction
Agencies
ELI5 AI
The FAA made a small fix to a previous rule they announced because they accidentally used the wrong number in their records. They changed the number from FAA-2023-2491 to the correct one, FAA-2024-2491, to make sure everything matches up and there are no mix-ups.
Summary AI
The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) is making a correction to a previous rule they published. This rule, originally announced on March 20, 2025, involved the creation of Class E airspace over Challis Airport in Idaho. The correction is to fix a typographical error in the agency docket number, changing it from FAA-2023-2491 to the correct number, FAA-2024-2491. This adjustment ensures all documents are accurate and consistent.
Abstract
The FAA is correcting a typographical error in the agency docket number within the final rule published in the Federal Register on March 20, 2025, establishing Class E airspace extending upward from 700 feet above the surface in Challis, ID.
Keywords AI
Sources
AnalysisAI
Overview
The document in question originates from the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), part of the U.S. Department of Transportation, and involves a correction to a previously published rule. The original rule, announced on March 20, 2025, dealt with the establishment of Class E airspace above Challis Airport in Idaho. A typographical error was found in the agency docket number, requiring alteration from FAA-2023-2491 to FAA-2024-2491. This kind of change ensures that all references in related documents are correct and consistent.
Significant Issues
One critical issue highlighted by the document is the presence of a typographical error in the agency docket number, a seemingly minor oversight that can have cascading effects. Such errors may lead to confusion among stakeholders or even administrative errors if the incorrect number is used as a reference. The FAA recognized this mistake and promptly issued a correction to prevent misunderstandings.
Public Impact
For the broad public, especially those engaged in aviation activities around Challis, Idaho, this document mostly assures accuracy and proper documentation within federal airspace regulations. Although the adjustment of a docket number may appear minor to the general public, it reflects the meticulous nature of federal regulations and the necessity for precision, which is crucial for maintaining trust and operational integrity in aviation.
Impact on Specific Stakeholders
Specific stakeholders, including aviation professionals, local authorities of Challis, and entities involved in logistical planning and legal compliance, may experience more direct effects. For these groups, an incorrect docket number might lead to referencing issues in legal documents, planning activities, or regulatory compliance efforts. Therefore, this correction is vital in ensuring procedures are followed correctly without informational discrepancies, which could otherwise result in administrative or operational difficulties.
Moreover, stakeholders who rely on the FAA's documentation for compliance purposes must be attentive to changes such as this correction to maintain compatibility with federal regulations. In this sense, the accurate docket number is crucial for their records and operations.
By addressing the typographical error proactively, the FAA demonstrates diligence and commitment to maintaining accurate records, ultimately supporting the needs of its diverse stakeholder base while upholding public transparency and effectiveness in regulatory practices.
Issues
• The document contains a typographical error in the agency docket number which was initially published incorrectly. This could potentially lead to confusion or administrative errors if stakeholders reference the incorrect docket number.
• The document relies on specific regulatory references, such as CFR and FAA Orders, which may be complex for those unfamiliar with aviation regulations, potentially limiting accessibility for some readers.
• The correction notice does not provide detailed information on the impact or implications of the incorrect docket number on stakeholders, which could be useful for transparency and understanding.