FR 2025-05472

Overview

Title

Records Governing Off-the-Record Communications; Public Notice

Agencies

ELI5 AI

FERC wants to make sure all secret chats that might affect big decisions are shared with everyone to keep things fair, and they have rules about how this needs to happen.

Summary AI

The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) issued a notice about the handling of off-the-record communications related to contested proceedings. According to Order No. 607, any FERC employee receiving such communications must submit them or a summary to the Commission's Secretary. Prohibited communications, which are not used in decision-making, can be included in the decision record if fairness requires. Exempt communications are usually part of the decision record unless involving specific agencies. A recent list of such communications is available on FERC's website.

Type: Notice
Citation: 90 FR 14254
Document #: 2025-05472
Date:
Volume: 90
Pages: 14254-14255

AnalysisAI

The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) has issued a notice concerning the management of off-the-record communications related to contested proceedings. This document clarifies the procedures for handling such communications, as outlined in the Commission's Order No. 607. At its core, this notice serves to inform the public about the methods by which certain communications not officially recorded in the proceedings are processed.

Summary of the Document

The notice specifies the obligations of FERC employees who come into contact with off-the-record communications. Such communications might be either prohibited or exempt. Employees are required to submit either the communication or a summary of its content to the Commission's Secretary. Prohibited communications are those that should not influence the decision-making process, unless fairness dictates their consideration. Conversely, exempt communications are typically part of the decisional record, with some exceptions, like those involving certain agencies.

Significant Issues and Concerns

The document does not include an abstract, which could have provided a succinct summary for readers seeking a quick comprehension of its content. Additionally, the notice heavily references regulatory provisions without elaboration, potentially posing challenges for individuals unfamiliar with such terms. Examples of what qualifies as exempt off-the-record communication are notably absent, possibly leading to ambiguity.

Moreover, the document offers URLs and contact information for further assistance but lacks direct clickable links or more detailed guidance. This could hinder those attempting to access or understand the available resources. The heavy use of technical jargon and regulatory references may further complicate understanding for the layperson.

Impact on the Public

Broadly, the document does not directly affect the daily lives of the general public but is crucial for preserving transparent and fair regulatory processes. By clearly delineating how off-the-record communications are handled, the FERC aims to ensure that proceedings remain impartial and just.

Impact on Specific Stakeholders

For stakeholders involved in FERC proceedings—such as energy companies, legal professionals, and regulatory bodies—this notice provides critical guidelines for ensuring compliance with communication regulations. Companies involved in contested proceedings may need to closely monitor such communications to safeguard their interests and ensure they are prepared to respond appropriately.

In summary, while this FERC notice is dense with legalese and regulatory references, its purpose is to maintain fairness and transparency in contested proceedings. Stakeholders within the energy sector likely find this information vital for navigating regulatory landscapes, despite its complexity.

Issues

  • • The document lacks an abstract in the metadata section, which could help summarize the content for quick understanding.

  • • The notice refers to complex regulatory provisions without elaboration, which may be challenging for individuals not familiar with these regulations (e.g., 18 CFR 385.2201(b)).

  • • The reference to exemption criteria lacks specific examples, which might lead to ambiguity regarding what constitutes an exempt off-the-record communication.

  • • The notice provides URLs and contact information for accessing additional resources or assistance, but lacks direct links or additional guidance on navigating these resources, potentially making it difficult for users to find the necessary documents.

  • • The use of technical jargon and references to specific regulations could make the notice difficult to understand for individuals who are not experts in regulatory matters.

Statistics

Size

Pages: 2
Words: 463
Sentences: 15
Entities: 29

Language

Nouns: 119
Verbs: 47
Adjectives: 18
Adverbs: 4
Numbers: 32

Complexity

Average Token Length:
4.72
Average Sentence Length:
30.87
Token Entropy:
4.69
Readability (ARI):
19.67

Reading Time

about a minute or two