Overview
Title
Combined Notice of Filings
Agencies
ELI5 AI
The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission is looking at some new plans about how much people should pay for using certain gas pipes and if folks should get any money back. Two companies, Horizon Pipeline and Natural Gas Pipeline, have made suggestions about this, and people can say what they think by April 7, 2025.
Summary AI
The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission has announced new filings regarding natural gas pipeline rate and refund reports. Two key applications have been filed: one by Horizon Pipeline Company about revenue crediting for 2024, and another by Natural Gas Pipeline Company of America concerning negotiated rate agreements effective April 1, 2025. Interested individuals can comment on these applications by April 7, 2025, and are encouraged to use the eFiling system for submissions. Further assistance is available through the Commission's Office of Public Participation.
Keywords AI
Sources
AnalysisAI
This document from the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) announces the receipt of new filings related to natural gas pipeline rates and refund reports. It details two significant applications: one by the Horizon Pipeline Company concerning a penalty revenue crediting report for 2024, and another by the Natural Gas Pipeline Company of America addressing negotiated rate agreements that will take effect on April 1, 2025. Interested parties have until April 7, 2025, to submit their comments.
General Summary
Horizon Pipeline Company has submitted a compliance filing concerning its penalty revenue crediting for the year 2024. However, the document does not specify the nature or outcome of the compliance aspect being reported. Meanwhile, the Natural Gas Pipeline Company of America has made a rate filing that involves various shippers, slated to become effective early in April 2025.
These filings open the gate for public engagement, where individuals can file interventions, protests, or responses to any complaints relevant to these proceedings. The FERC encourages the use of its eFiling system, and the Office of Public Participation is available to aid the public in this process.
Significant Issues or Concerns
One noticeable issue is the absence of an abstract to summarize the document, which could aid in a quicker understanding for readers. The term "Compliance filing" is used ambiguously regarding Horizon Pipeline, providing little insight into the exact nature of what's being reported. Additionally, the legal references to specific sections of the Code of Federal Regulations might not be easily comprehensible to the layperson. Another area that could benefit from clarification is the statement "eFiling is encouraged." Without an explanation of why this method is preferred, individuals may be left wondering about its advantages over traditional filing methods.
The lack of detail on different filing effectiveness dates is another point of concern. While the filing by the Natural Gas Pipeline Company of America has a specific effective date, Horizon Pipeline's filing does not.
Potential Impact on the Public
Broadly, these filings may impact gas consumers, as changes in pipeline rates and refunds could potentially affect energy prices. However, the document does not provide specific details on how these filings might translate into cost implications for consumers.
Impact on Specific Stakeholders
Energy Companies and Shippers: For those engaged in the natural gas sector, these filings could have direct financial implications. They could alter the revenue structure or incurred costs, contingent on the FERC's final decisions regarding these applications.
Public and Community Organizations: Members of the public, particularly those living in areas directly served by the pipeline companies, might experience indirect effects, such as changes in utility rates. Moreover, community organizations that are advocating for transparency in energy rate settings could leverage this opportunity for engagement in public discussions facilitated by the Office of Public Participation.
Special Needs Communities: The document mentions a TTY contact number, accommodating those with hearing impairments. This is a positive step ensuring inclusivity in public participation, yet it could benefit from additional explanation to increase general awareness of TTY services.
Ultimately, while the document outlines procedural aspects quite effectively, it underscores the need for clearer communication regarding the details and broader public impacts of such regulatory filings. Such clarity would serve to enhance public understanding and engagement in energy regulation processes.
Issues
• The document lacks an abstract, which could help provide a summary of the content for better understanding.
• The term 'Compliance filing' in the description for Horizon Pipeline Company is vague and does not specify the nature of the compliance being reported.
• The document uses legal references such as '18 CFR 385.211, 385.214, or 385.206', which may be difficult for the general public to understand without additional context or explanation.
• The phrase 'eFiling is encouraged' might be perceived as suggesting a preference without explaining the benefits or reasons why eFiling is preferred over other methods.
• Contact information for TTY users might not be well understood without explaining what TTY is.
• The document lacks information on why some filings are effective immediately while others have an unspecified effective date.