FR 2025-05437

The document from the Federal Register announces that Sea Shepherd Global is applying for a permit from the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) to film marine mammals in the Southern Ocean and Antarctica. Specifically, they intend to document 13 species of non-listed marine mammals for commercial and educational purposes over the next five years. The agency is currently in the process of reviewing this application and is seeking public feedback by April 30, 2025.

Summary of the Document

Sea Shepherd Global has proposed to film 13 species of marine mammals, which are not listed as endangered, in a bid to create documentaries and other media. The regulatory oversight falls under the Marine Mammal Protection Act of 1972. Interestingly, the proposed filming activity has been preliminarily considered as not requiring a detailed environmental assessment. This means that, according to past categorizations, the activity is not anticipated to have a major environmental impact. The NMFS has also shared this application with the Marine Mammal Commission and its Committee of Scientific Advisors for further review.

Significant Issues and Concerns

Several concerns arise from the document. Firstly, it does not specify the number of each species that may be filmed, which could be pivotal in assessing the activity's potential impact on marine life. Such a lack of specification might lead to difficulties in properly monitoring and regulating the filmmaking activities, posing a risk of over-filming.

Secondly, while the activity is categorically excluded from environmental assessments, the document lacks clarity on the reasoning behind this decision. It leaves room for skepticism about potential environmental impacts, which might worry environmental activists or stakeholders focused on marine conservation.

Moreover, the document outlines that individuals can request the application details, but it is not clear how accessible these documents are, which might limit public engagement and scrutiny. Another point of vagueness is in how the collected media will be utilized and who stands to benefit, which might lead to questions regarding transparency and purpose.

Finally, there are concerns about the efficiency and adequacy of resources used for permitting and monitoring these activities. No information is provided on budgetary implications, an oversight that could concern taxpayers and individuals interested in governmental accountability.

Impact on the Public

Broadly, the document presents potential educational and scientific value through documentaries, which may help raise awareness and knowledge about marine mammals. However, the lack of detailed public information might hinder full public participation in the permitting process.

Impact on Stakeholders

For environmental groups and conservationists, the permit might represent both an opportunity and a challenge. On one hand, it could promote marine conservation through public awareness. On the other, without stringent oversight measures, there might be concerns about environmental disturbance or exploitation.

From an industry perspective, media entities or organizations focused on environmental awareness might benefit from access to rare footage of marine life, enhancing their content offerings. However, this is tempered by any ethical or environmental concerns that could arise if the filming negatively impacts marine ecosystems.

In conclusion, while the application aims to broaden understanding and appreciation of marine mammals, it is vital to address the ambiguities and concerns about transparency, environmental impact, and regulatory oversight to ensure a balanced and positive outcome for all stakeholders involved.