FR 2025-05352

The document published by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) announces the intent to prepare an Environmental Assessment (EA) for the re-licensing of the Spencer Mountain Hydroelectric Project in North Carolina. This hydroelectric project, operated by Spencer Mountain Hydropower, LLC, produces 0.64 megawatts of power and is situated on the South Fork Catawba River in Gaston County, near Gastonia.

General Summary

The primary objective of the document is to inform the public about the EA that is being prepared to evaluate the environmental impact of renewing the hydroelectric project's operating license. FERC staff has indicated that, based on their current information, relicensing is not expected to result in significant environmental effects. Once the EA is completed, it will be available for public review and comments. These comments will be considered in the final licensing decision.

The document also highlights the role of FERC's Office of Public Participation (OPP), which aims to facilitate public engagement in the process. Contact information is provided for the public to make inquiries or submit comments related to the project.

Significant Issues or Concerns

Several issues arise from the document:

1. Lack of Specifics on Environmental Concerns: The document does not specify any particular environmental concerns that the EA will address. This omission leaves room for uncertainty among stakeholders and the public about potential risks or considerations.

2. Timeline Uncertainty: There is no clear timeline provided for the completion of the licensing decision. This could be concerning for stakeholders who need to plan for potential impacts on their interests.

3. Public Engagement Guidance: While contact information is provided, the document could benefit from additional guidance or examples on how the public can effectively engage in the process.

4. Use of Tracking Identification: Although a unique identification number is mentioned for tracking purposes, there are no instructions on how the public can utilize this number to monitor progress or access documents.

5. Absence of Quantitative Data: No quantitative data or estimated impact figures are provided, which might help stakeholders and the public better understand the potential environmental or social implications of the project.

Impact on the Public and Stakeholders

Broad Public Impact: The public is invited to participate in the decision-making process through comments on the EA. However, the lack of detailed information might limit informed participation. The decision to relicense the project could have long-term environmental impacts, both positive and negative, which the public should consider.

Impact on Specific Stakeholders: Local communities, environmental organizations, and other stakeholders may have particular interests in how the project affects the river ecosystem, wildlife, and community energy resources. The lack of detailed information and clear timelines in the document could complicate stakeholders' ability to advocate effectively for their interests and prepare for the potential impacts of the final decision.

Overall, while the document serves its primary function of notifying the public, its shortcomings in detail might challenge those wishing to engage deeply in the licensing process. Addressing these issues could help facilitate more meaningful public involvement and transparency in the process.