Overview
Title
Agency Information Collection Activities; Submission to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for Review and Approval; Comment Request; Evaluation of SE Catch Shares Programs
Agencies
ELI5 AI
The Commerce Department wants to ask people questions about fishing in the Southeast to see how it can make fishing better and follow the rules. They're asking anyone to share their thoughts about this idea within the next month.
Summary AI
The Department of Commerce is seeking comments on a new information collection regarding the evaluation of Southeast Catch Shares Programs, conducted by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. This evaluation is mandated by the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act and involves surveying catch share participants in the southeast region for socio-economic data. The collected information will help improve fishery management decision-making and comply with various legal requirements. Public comments on this proposal are invited and must be submitted within 30 days of the publication of this notice.
Keywords AI
Sources
AnalysisAI
The Bureau of the Federal Register has published a notice about a proposed new information collection by the Department of Commerce, specifically initiated by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA). This notice is part of regulatory compliance, necessitated by federal mandates, to ensure certain programs are effective and sustainable. The document's primary aim is to solicit public and inter-agency feedback on proposed data collections, as well as ongoing collections, tied to the Southeast Catch Shares Programs. Feedback is critical in assessing how these requirements impact individuals or businesses and in seeking ways to reduce the burden of gathering this information.
General Overview
The notice announces that the Department of Commerce is planning to undertake a new survey to evaluate Catch Shares Programs in the Southeast U.S., as required by the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act. This evaluation attempts to collect socioeconomic data from participating fishermen in the region. The survey endeavors to capture various aspects, such as demographics, economic decision-making, and shifts in fishing practices, with the goal to refine future fishery management plans and meet legislative requirements.
Significant Issues or Concerns
There are several points in the notice that merit further consideration:
Lack of Justification: While the survey meets legal requirements, the document fails to provide a compelling rationale for how these data collections will directly lead to tangible policy or regulatory changes, leaving respondents unclear about their potential impact.
Technical Language: The notice uses technical terms and legislative references that may not be easily understood by the general public, making it hard for non-specialists to appreciate the survey's purpose or importance.
Burden Calculation Transparency: There's insufficient explanation on how the estimated burden of 310 hours for respondents was calculated, which may be perceived as lacking transparency.
Confidentiality Measures: The document does not mention any specific steps taken to protect the privacy and security of the information collected, which is an important concern for participants providing potentially sensitive data.
Cost Implications: There is no discussion about any costs that might be incurred by the respondents or the executing agency, which could impact businesses in terms of time and resources.
Public Impact
For the general public, particularly in communities tied to the fishing industry, this survey could play a crucial role in shaping future regulations and sustainability practices. However, without clear communication of its purpose and benefits, there may be limited engagement or support. Ensuring transparent reporting and addressing confidentiality concerns could significantly enhance public trust and participation.
Stakeholder Impacts
Positive Impacts:
- Regulatory Compliance: The survey helps fulfill federal legal directives, ensuring programs align with broader environmental and economic policies.
- Fisheries Management: Insights gleaned could refine fishery management strategies, potentially leading to more sustainable economic practices and environmental conservation efforts, benefiting long-term stakeholders in the fishing industry.
Negative Impacts:
- Burdens on Respondents: Businesses might face additional administrative duties, especially if the survey seems cumbersome, unclear, or if it implies unforeseen costs or efforts without apparent direct benefits.
- Engagement Issues: Confusing language or insufficient transparency regarding benefits and utilization of the data can lead to low engagement from targeted respondents.
Overall, while the notice aims to enhance the accountability and efficiency of the Southeast Catch Shares Programs, clearer communication and outlined benefits would help ensure this survey benefits both participants and the broader community in a meaningful way.
Issues
• The document does not provide a clear justification for the need for the survey beyond satisfying legal mandates, which might lead to questions about the necessity of the data collection.
• It is unclear how the survey's findings will specifically influence policy changes or amendments to fishery management plans.
• The language describing the purpose and needs of the survey is somewhat technical and may not be easily understood by the general public.
• There is no detailed breakdown of how the estimated total annual burden of 310 hours was calculated, which could be perceived as lacking transparency.
• There is no mention of any specific measures that will be taken to ensure the confidentiality and security of the data collected from respondents.
• There is no information about any potential costs involved for respondents or the agency in conducting this information collection.