FR 2025-05183

Overview

Title

Product Change-Priority Mail and USPS Ground Advantage® Negotiated Service Agreement

Agencies

ELI5 AI

The Postal Service wants to make a new deal for sending packages in the U.S. called a Negotiated Service Agreement. They filed a request to do this on March 20, 2025, with a special group that checks these things.

Summary AI

The Postal Service has announced that it filed a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission seeking to add a new domestic shipping services contract for Priority Mail and USPS Ground Advantage to the Competitive Products List. This contract is known as Negotiated Service Agreement 656. The filing took place on March 20, 2025, and is in accordance with legal provisions 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3). Anyone interested can find more details on the Postal Regulatory Commission’s website under Docket Nos. MC2025-1248 and K2025-1247.

Abstract

The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

Type: Notice
Citation: 90 FR 13901
Document #: 2025-05183
Date:
Volume: 90
Pages: 13901-13901

AnalysisAI

Summary of the Document

The Federal Register notice informs readers that the United States Postal Service (USPS) has submitted a request to the Postal Regulatory Commission. This request intends to add a new domestic shipping services contract to the Competitive Products List. The contract is part of the Negotiated Service Agreements, specifically contract number 656, which involves Priority Mail and USPS Ground Advantage. The submission, filed on March 20, 2025, complies with specific legal statutes, namely 39 U.S.C. §§ 3642 and 3632(b)(3). Moreover, interested parties are directed to the Postal Regulatory Commission's website for further details related to the request, identified under Docket Nos. MC2025-1248 and K2025-1247.

Significant Issues or Concerns

The document presents several notable issues. Firstly, it lacks specific details about the terms of the contract in question, which makes it impossible to assess potential concerns such as wasteful spending. This absence of information might lead readers to speculate on the implications of the agreement. Additionally, there is no mention of favoritism toward any particular organizations or individuals, but the opacity of contract details does not allow full confirmation of impartiality. The technical jargon and legal references may pose comprehension challenges to readers unfamiliar with postal and regulatory terminology. This complexity could deter the general public from engaging with or understanding the relevance of the document.

Potential Impact on the Public

The introduction of a new shipping services contract could have implications for both service pricing and delivery options available to the public. However, due to the absence of detailed contract terms, the actual impact on consumers remains unclear. Without this information, it is challenging for the public to ascertain whether they will benefit from more competitive prices or improved service delivery. Moreover, the lack of details about how this contract might alter or enhance existing services means that consumers are left in the dark about changes that could affect their daily mailing needs.

Impact on Specific Stakeholders

While the document does not detail specific stakeholders, businesses and frequent mail service users are likely to be directly affected by the changes proposed in the new service agreement. Companies relying on USPS for logistics might benefit from potentially more favorable terms or enhanced service options. Conversely, if the contract leads to increased shipping costs, small businesses and consumers could face increased operational expenses. Additionally, the government and regulatory bodies, such as the Postal Regulatory Commission, will need to carefully evaluate the terms to ensure compliance and fair competition, safeguarding public interest in the postal services sector.

Overall, while the notice provides a formal announcement of USPS's request, the lack of transparency regarding specific contract details means that its full implications for both the general public and specific stakeholders remain uncertain. It's crucial for future communications to elucidate these aspects to facilitate informed public discourse and assessment.

Issues

  • • The document does not mention any potential wasteful spending, as it is primarily a notice regarding a filing with the Postal Regulatory Commission. However, specifics of the contract are not detailed, so potential areas of concern cannot be fully assessed.

  • • The document gives no indication of favoritism towards particular organizations or individuals, but the lack of detail on the contract terms makes it difficult to confirm this entirely.

  • • The language used in the document is technical and assumes familiarity with regulatory and postal terms, which might be unclear to the general public.

  • • The use of codes and specific legal references (e.g., 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), Docket Nos. MC2025-1248, K2025-1247) could be seen as overly complex to an audience not familiar with such references.

  • • There is no detailed information about the impact of the addition of this service contract on prices or services for consumers, which might be of public interest.

Statistics

Size

Pages: 1
Words: 203
Sentences: 10
Entities: 22

Language

Nouns: 78
Verbs: 8
Adjectives: 4
Adverbs: 1
Numbers: 20

Complexity

Average Token Length:
4.98
Average Sentence Length:
20.30
Token Entropy:
4.47
Readability (ARI):
14.89

Reading Time

less than a minute