Overview
Title
Submission for Review: 3206-0179, Disabled Dependent Questionnaire, RI 30-10
Agencies
ELI5 AI
The government wants to ask people questions to decide if some grown-up kids who are not able to take care of themselves can get health and money help. They're asking everyone if this is important and if they can make it easier to answer these questions.
Summary AI
The Office of Personnel Management (OPM) is inviting comments from the public and federal agencies on the reinstatement of an information collection request used to assess the eligibility of disabled adult children for benefits like health coverage or survivor annuity payments. This collection, known as the Disabled Dependent Questionnaire (RI 30-10), requires input on its necessity, accuracy, and how the process might be improved or made less burdensome using technology. Comments will be accepted until May 27, 2025, and the process is governed by the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
Abstract
Office of Personnel Management (OPM) Retirement Services offers the general public and other federal agencies the opportunity to comment on the reinstatement of an expired information collection request (ICR), Disabled Dependent Questionnaire, RI 30-10.
Keywords AI
Sources
AnalysisAI
The document archived here addresses a notice from the Office of Personnel Management (OPM), specifically concerning the reinstatement of the Disabled Dependent Questionnaire (RI 30-10), an information collection request. This document invites comments from the public and federal agencies on the utility and efficiency of this questionnaire, which is used to determine eligibility for benefits for disabled adult children under retirement systems.
Summary of the Document
The Disabled Dependent Questionnaire aims to assess whether a disabled adult child is eligible for health benefits coverage and/or survivor annuity payments under federal retirement systems. OPM is actively seeking public and agency feedback to evaluate the necessity, accuracy, and potential improvements of this process, in compliance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995. The notice is open for public comments until May 27, 2025.
Significant Issues and Concerns
Several issues arise from this notice. First, the abstract and other parts of the document seem somewhat repetitive, providing similar or identical information that might not be necessary. The document does not elaborate on how feedback from the public will be utilized in refining or deciding on the reinstatement, which could raise concerns about transparency in the decision-making process.
Moreover, while it mentions that "Individuals or Households" will be affected, it does not clarify which groups within these categories might feel the impact most strongly. The absence of a glossary or a section defining technical terms like "ICR" and "OMB" might confuse readers unfamiliar with governmental jargon. Additionally, the document does not present potential consequences if the information collection request is not reinstated, which could help in evaluating its importance.
Impact on the Public
This notice holds potential implications for the wider public, particularly for households with disabled adult dependents. The reinstatement of the questionnaire might streamline the process of verifying eligibility for critical benefits, thus positively impacting those dependent on health benefits and annuity payments. Conversely, if the process is not implemented effectively, it might create unnecessary burdens on those required to submit the forms.
Impact on Specific Stakeholders
The primary stakeholders here are disabled adult children and their families, who could either benefit from simplified access to necessary benefits or face challenges if the process is cumbersome and labor-intensive. Additionally, federal agencies and other entities involved in administering these benefits may be impacted based on how feedback is addressed and incorporated into the final reinstatement.
Overall, while the notice serves a fundamental purpose in gathering public input, it is crucial for OPM to address these concerns ensuring the process is transparent, accessible, and beneficial to those it intends to serve.
Issues
• The abstract and summary in the document text appear to be repetitive, providing the same information regarding the opportunity for public comment on the reinstatement of an expired information collection request (ICR).
• The document does not specify any particular organizations or individuals who might benefit disproportionately or unfairly from the ICR reinstatement, which could be considered an oversight in transparency.
• The phrase 'affected public: Individuals or Households' could be expanded to provide more context or clarity on who specifically in these categories might be impacted by the collection.
• The document uses a number of technical terms and acronyms such as 'ICR', 'OMB', 'RID', 'FR Doc.', and 'CFR' without providing a glossary or definitions, which can be confusing for readers unfamiliar with government jargon.
• There is a lack of concrete information on how the feedback from the public will be used or incorporated in the decision-making process regarding the ICR.
• The document does not provide information on potential consequences or impacts if the reinstatement is not made, which would help in assessing the necessity of the ICR.