FR 2025-05074

Overview

Title

Privacy Act of 1974; System of Records

Agencies

ELI5 AI

The government is deciding to stop using an old record-keeping system that tracked help given to people during emergencies, like fixing storms or floods. They promise it won't cause problems because they'll use a different way to collect this important information.

Summary AI

The U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS) is planning to cancel a system of records notice for the Individuals and Households Program Equity Analysis Records System, managed by the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). This change will not negatively impact individuals, as FEMA will stop collecting data for this program but will continue collecting information for disaster assistance through another system. All previous records will be archived and eventually destroyed. This decision is part of a broader effort to streamline DHS's records management processes.

Abstract

In accordance with the Privacy Act of 1974, the U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS) is giving notice that it proposes to rescind the following Privacy Act system of records notice, "DHS/ Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA)-017 Individuals and Households Program Equity Analysis Records System of Records." The Notice of Rescindment identifies the system of records, explains why the notice is being rescinded, and provides an account of the records previously maintained in the system.

Type: Notice
Citation: 90 FR 13772
Document #: 2025-05074
Date:
Volume: 90
Pages: 13772-13772

AnalysisAI

In the Federal Register document issued by the U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS), a rescindment of a system of records notice is announced. This notice pertains specifically to the Individuals and Households Program Equity Analysis Records System, which was managed by the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). The rescission was made in accordance with the Privacy Act of 1974. Notably, this change has been introduced with assurances that it won't negatively affect individuals, as FEMA will discontinue data collection through this program but will continue to collect relevant data through alternative methods.

General Summary

The document details the decision to cancel the system of records notice for the Individuals and Households Program Equity Analysis Records System. DHS has decided to discontinue this specific record-keeping system as part of a broader initiative to streamline the management of records within the department. Historical records from the canceled system will be archived and are slated for destruction after six years and three months in accordance with the established guidelines from the National Archives and Records Administration. Meanwhile, for disaster assistance programs, data collection and management will continue through the existing system known as the DHS/FEMA-008 Disaster Recovery Assistance Files System of Records.

Significant Issues and Concerns

A few areas within the document raise potential concerns. Firstly, the document does not explicitly clarify the reasons behind the rescindment of the records notice. The lack of transparency regarding the impetus for this decision might leave stakeholders questioning the rationale behind eliminating a potentially valuable data management tool.

Additionally, while the document mentions the continued reliance on an alternative system of records for disaster assistance data, it does not provide detailed comparisons or explanations regarding the effectiveness or improvements offered by the newer system. This vagueness could lead to uncertainty about how well the new system will serve the intended purpose.

There is also a need for clearer language, especially around the processes of storing and destroying archived records. Terms like "inactive storage" are used without sufficient explanation, which might confuse those unfamiliar with record management terminologies.

Impact on the Public

For the general public, the decision to rescind this system of records is unlikely to have a direct noticeable impact. FEMA's continued commitment to collecting necessary data for its disaster assistance programs ensures that individuals needing aid in the wake of federal disasters will not face disruptions.

However, for those particularly interested in how government data on individuals and households is managed, the lack of detailed information about transitions between systems can be a source of concern. Understanding these shifts is crucial for those focused on data privacy and government transparency.

Impact on Specific Stakeholders

Stakeholders directly involved in disaster management and governmental privacy practices might feel the most immediate impact. The rescindment signifies a shift in how FEMA manages and analyzes data related to individuals and households affected by disasters.

For privacy advocates and those involved in data management, the absence of explanations regarding the reason behind this change might be seen as a step back in transparent departmental policy-making. Conversely, the move to streamline record management could be viewed positively by those advocating for more efficient government practices, as long as these changes do not compromise the public's access to necessary support in emergencies.

Conclusively, while the document maintains that the change will not harm individuals or impede FEMA’s ability to provide disaster assistance, the broader impacts regarding data privacy, transparency, and management efficiency are areas worth observing as DHS proceeds with its updated protocols.

Issues

  • • The document does not specify why the rescindment is necessary or what prompted the decision, which could lead to ambiguity and lack of transparency.

  • • The information regarding alternative systems for maintaining necessary data is not detailed enough, providing only a general reference without explaining the effectiveness or improvements of the new system in comparison to the rescinded system.

  • • Language around the storage and destruction timeline of the records could be clarified, particularly in explaining what constitutes 'inactive storage’.

Statistics

Size

Pages: 1
Words: 580
Sentences: 20
Entities: 59

Language

Nouns: 227
Verbs: 34
Adjectives: 15
Adverbs: 4
Numbers: 38

Complexity

Average Token Length:
4.96
Average Sentence Length:
29.00
Token Entropy:
4.91
Readability (ARI):
19.65

Reading Time

about 2 minutes