FR 2025-05053

Overview

Title

Notice of Public Meeting of the New York Advisory Committee to the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights

Agencies

ELI5 AI

The U.S. is having a special online meeting to talk about fairness and rights for people on April 23, 2025, and anyone can listen or talk there. You can watch the meeting on the computer through Zoom, and if you have something to say, you can also write or email them after the meeting.

Summary AI

The U.S. Commission on Civil Rights has announced that the New York Advisory Committee will hold a public meeting through Zoom on Wednesday, April 23, 2025, from 11:00 a.m. to 12:30 p.m. ET. The meeting will discuss civil rights issues and will be open for public comments. Interested individuals can join the meeting via a provided Zoom link or by phone; closed captioning will be available. Written comments are welcome and must be submitted within 30 days after the meeting.

Abstract

Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the provisions of the rules and regulations of the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights (Commission) and the Federal Advisory Committee Act, that the New York Advisory Committee (Committee) to the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights will hold a public business meeting via Zoom at 11:00 a.m. ET on Wednesday, April 23, 2025.

Type: Notice
Citation: 90 FR 13730
Document #: 2025-05053
Date:
Volume: 90
Pages: 13730-13730

AnalysisAI

The recent notice from the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights announces that the New York Advisory Committee will hold a public meeting via Zoom on April 23, 2025. Scheduled from 11:00 a.m. to 12:30 p.m. ET, this meeting will focus on civil rights issues and is open for public comments. Participants can join through a Zoom link or by phone, with closed captioning provided for accessibility.

General Summary

This document serves as an official notice about an upcoming public meeting organized by the New York Advisory Committee, part of the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights. The meeting aims to discuss civil rights matters and engage the public in conversation. The public can choose to attend via Zoom for audio and visual participation or join by phone for audio-only access.

Significant Issues and Concerns

There are several noteworthy issues and omissions within the document:

  1. Cost Transparency: The document does not detail the costs associated with hosting the meeting, such as potential Zoom fees or personnel expenses. While public meetings typically aim for transparency, the lack of cost information makes it difficult to evaluate resource allocation.

  2. Phone Call Charges: The notice mentions that individuals calling in via wireless lines may incur regular charges but fails to clarify what these charges might be. This could lead to confusion and potentially discourage some from participating if they expect high costs.

  3. Submission of Comments: Currently, the document only allows for written comments to be submitted via email to David Barreras. This could disadvantage individuals without access to email, limiting their ability to participate fully.

  4. Physical Address Omission: While it states that records can be inspected at the Regional Programs Coordination Unit, the notice does not provide a physical address for this location, potentially hindering those interested in reviewing documentation in person.

  5. Accommodations for Hearing Impaired: Closed captioning is noted, yet there is no mention of additional accommodations for individuals with hearing impairments beyond this feature, which could limit full accessibility for those attendees.

Impact on the Public

The primary impact on the public from this notice is the opportunity to participate in discussions about vital civil rights issues. The meeting is open to the public, fulfilling a critical function of transparency and inclusivity, allowing people from different backgrounds to voice their opinions and concerns.

Impact on Specific Stakeholders

Certain population segments might experience different impacts due to this document:

  • People with Disabilities: While closed captioning is offered, the lack of further accommodations for hearing impairments might make full participation challenging for some individuals.

  • Individuals without Email Access: Those without access to the internet or email services may feel excluded from submitting comments, pointing to a digital divide issue that institutions need to address for future inclusivity.

  • Financially Constrained Individuals: Ambiguity around potential call charges might deter economically disadvantaged individuals from participating, impacting the diversity of voices present at the meeting.

Overall, while the document facilitates public involvement in civil rights discussions, the highlighted issues indicate areas for improvement to ensure broader and more inclusive participation.

Issues

  • • The document does not specify any costs associated with holding the meeting, which could include Zoom Webinar fees or personnel costs, making it difficult to assess if there is any wasteful spending.

  • • The language regarding incurring charges for phone calls over wireless lines does not specify what regular charges might entail, which could lead to public confusion.

  • • The instructions for submitting written comments only mention David Barreras' email and not a physical mailing option, potentially limiting access for those without email access.

  • • The document mentions that records can be inspected at the Regional Programs Coordination Unit but doesn't provide a physical address for this location.

  • • While the meeting advertises that closed captioning is available, there is no direct mention of accommodations for individuals with hearing impairments other than closed captioning.

Statistics

Size

Pages: 1
Words: 558
Sentences: 28
Entities: 39

Language

Nouns: 193
Verbs: 37
Adjectives: 23
Adverbs: 6
Numbers: 31

Complexity

Average Token Length:
5.06
Average Sentence Length:
19.93
Token Entropy:
5.03
Readability (ARI):
15.72

Reading Time

about a minute or two